April 1, 2008

Merrill Lynch Sues Insurer for Failing to Honor Claims Opening Door to Mysterious "Swaps" Market

Merrill Lynch & Co. has publicly opened the door to what many believe could be an even larger problem to the credit markets than the widely publicized sub-prime mortgage debacle - the little understood and sledom discussed "swaps" market.

Perhaps the world’s most high-profile financial firm, Merrill - itself a frequent complainer about lawsuits – has filed a monster of a suit in a New York court against bond insurer Security Capital Assurance Ltd. (SCA). Merrill Lynch sued the insurer alleging it failed to honor seven contracts promising to cover losses on $3.1 billion in "credit swaps," after which SCA filed a countersuit against Merrill for $28 million. .

Merrill claims SCA walked away from signed insurance contracts guaranteeing Merrill against losses. SCA counterclaims that Merrill broke a stipulation in one of the contracts which entitles SCA to terminate all the agreements and collect damages. (Perhaps Merrill is getting a taste of what many us have experienced: an insurance company happy to collect premiums but which later relies on a technicality to avoid payment.)

Under the contracts, SCA says it was granted "control rights" over the CDOs, meaning it had control over decisions affecting the investments. SCA alleges that "Merrill Lynch made the decision to blatantly ignore its prior commitments,” when, in a “rushed campaign” to dump risk from its books, Merrill Lynch promised such control rights to others.

Yet, some believe the greater importance of this suit is that it reveals the tip of the iceberg regarding the exposure of the world’s financial institutions to the multi-trillion dollar “swaps” market. The swap contracts in question were agreements to cover missed payments on collateralized-debt obligations, but an untold amount of “swaps” agreements outstanding cover more possibilities and circumstances than most of us can imagine!

Because the “swaps market” is almost totally unregulated and involves agreements eerily similar to those engineered at Enron, few publicly venture a guess as to the gravety of the exposure to the financial markets should such swap agreements simply began to unwind.

The law firm of Shepherd, Smith, Edwards & Kantas is committed to assisting investors to recover losses in their accounts at securities firms. If you or someone you know is a victim of securities fraud, contact us today to arrange a free confidential consultation with one of our attorneys.

Bookmark: Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Google.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at del.icio.us Digg Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Digg.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Spurl.net Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Simpy.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at NewsVine Blink this Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at blinklist.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Furl.net Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at reddit.com Fark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Fark.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%20Sues%20Insurer%20for%20Failing%20to%20Honor%20Claims%20Opening%20Door%20to%20Mysterious%20%22Swaps%22%20Market at Yahoo! MyWeb

March 12, 2008

Countrywide Financial, Merrill Lynch, and Citigroup Executives Defend Their Hefty Compensations Following Subprime Mortgage Crisis

Appearing before the U.S. Congress last week, Countrywide Financial CEO and founder Angelo Mozilo, Ex-Citigroup CEO Charles Prince, and Ex-Merrill Lynch Chairman and CEO Stanley O’Neil gave their testimonies to the House Committee on Government and Oversight Reform.

The three men say that reports about their compensation are “grossly exaggerated” and that they too have lost millions of dollars from the mortgage debacle. On Thursday, the Congressional issued a report stating that the three men earned $460 million between 2002 and 2006.

All three men say their income from the firms are tied to the profits that the companies made in the years prior to the mortgage crisis and that their company stock has dropped dramatically since then.

Mozilo reportedly stood to earn $115 after Countrywide’s pending sale to Bank of America is completed. He now has agreed to forfeit $37.5 million.

O’Neal received $161 million after stepping down from Merrill Lynch. Prince left Citigroup last November with about $68 million.

Other Wall Street CEO’s that have generated media buzz for their generous compensations:

-Last year, Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO Lloyd Blankenfein received $68 million—the largest bonus ever for an industry head.

-Robert Nardelli, Chrysler Chairman and CEO, took away $210 million in stock options, money, and retirement benefits after being asked to leave Home Depot.

In 2006, 386 Fortune 500 firm chiefs received $10.8 million in compensation.

Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents stockbroker fraud clients that have lost money because of the negligence or misconduct of a member of a securities industry. One of our securities fraud lawyers can discuss your case during a free consultation.


Related Web Resources:

Mortgage mess CEOs defend pay, CNN Money.com, March 7, 2008

Congress quizzes financial execs on CEO pay 'lottery', USA Today, March 7, 2008

Committee Holds Hearing on CEO Pay and the Mortgage Crisis, House Committee on Government and Oversight Reform

February 22, 2008

SEC Involved in 36 Subprime Mortgage Industry Probes

The Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting three dozen open investigations into misconduct in the subprime mortgage industry. The probe is taking a look at possible misconduct involving:

• The origination process
• Insider trading
• Securitization and sales of mortgage-backed securities

According to SEC Division of Enforcement Associate Director Cheryl Scarboro, the SEC wants to know who may have been involved, who knew about any misconduct, and who acted inappropriately. Scarboro also directs the SEC Subprime Working Group, which coordinates these probes with other SEC divisions.

In SEC v. Doral Financial Corp., Doral settled claims that it overstated income on nonconforming loans for $25 million. The primary issues pertaining to this case included valuation of the future income stream, valuation of interest-only STRP’s, and applying a flat rate to value investments.

These issues are of major significance in pending cases involving the subprime mortgage industry. Other issues of focus in the SEC investigations include ownership transfer and booking the gain on sale.

The SEC has met with the companies it is investigating is helping to streamline the process.

In a recent TIME.com article, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc. Bose George estimated potential losses from the subprime mortgage crisis at around $250 billion. Columbia University professor Charles Calomiris estimates the losses at over $300 billion but under $400 billion. $1 trillion outstanding subprime mortgages currently exist.

Please contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards to discuss your case. We have helped thousands of investors recoup their losses.

Related Web Resources:

How Bad Will the Mortgage Crisis Get?, TIME.com, February 19, 2008

SEC probing three dozen subprime cases, Reuters, December 21, 2007

Why a U.S. Subprime Mortgage Crisis Is Felt Around the World, New York Times, August 21, 2007

Bookmark: Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Google.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at del.icio.us Digg SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Digg.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Spurl.net Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Simpy.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at NewsVine Blink this SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at blinklist.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Furl.net Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at reddit.com Fark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Fark.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 11, 2008

Pondering the SEC’s Role in the Subprime Mortgage Crisis

What was the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the collapse of the subprime mortgage bubble? Although mortgage brokers, investment banks, and ratings agencies are frequently held responsible for the demise, little is said about the roles of the Financial Industry Regulatory Industry (FINRA) and the SEC—both watchdog agencies that are responsible for monitoring complex credit derivatives and their suitability requirements for investors.

Yet where was the SEC when it was time to oversee investment banks and determine whether they had sufficient capital for their balance sheets, trading positions, and the appropriate risk management systems so that major losses could be avoided?

One notable problem is that there is not enough clear data available about the credit derivatives market. Structured finance products, including collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) are traded over-the-counter in the United States. This means that price information for these products is not easily accessible.

It wasn’t until 2007 that the SEC, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and other members of the President’s Working Group recommended that stricter oversight of the over-the-counter market be implemented.

While regulators are now examining the way banks structured, priced, and sold mortgage-laden securities, some industry insiders feel that these steps were taken too late. Should the SEC have noticed the warning signs?

In 2006, Merrill Lynch senior executive Jeff Kronthal was fired when he responded reluctantly to former Chief Executive Stanley O’Neal’s mandate that firms be more aggressive about taking risks with mortgage securities. Morgan Stanley’s new Chief Executive John Thain rehired Kronthal last December.

In 2005, Bear Stearns reported in its 2005 financial disclosure that it was threatened by a possible civil enforcement action related to pricing, analysis, and valuation of $63 billion in CDOs. Bear Stearns also reported that then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer had contacted the firm about $16 billion in CDOs it had sold to an undisclosed client.

Former SEC attorney Gary Aguirre says that while aggressively pursuing Pequote Capital and its alleged involvement in an insider trading case in 2005, he was fired when he tried to interview Morgan Stanley Chief Executive John Mack. Aguirre claims that the SEC is too closely associated with the industry it regulates.

Earlier this month, securities regulators in Massachusetts filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Merrill Lynch over $14 million in CDOs that the firm sold to the town of Springfield. Regulators say they were unsuitable for and sold without the town’s permission. Merrill has admitted to the town’s lack of consent and paid its investment back in full—although it now has little value.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation says it is conducting criminal investigations into 14 firms regarding their involvement in mortgage securitization activities.

Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, and Goldman Sachs all admit that different regulators have asked them about their handling of subprime mortgage securities.

If you are an investor who has lost money because of the misconduct or negligence of someone in the securities industry, please contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today. Your first consultation with one of our stockbroker fraud lawyers is free.

Related Web Resources:

SEC

Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO), Investopedia

Subprime Mortgage, Investopedia