January 10, 2012

Securities Fraud Lawsuit Names NRP Financial Inc. in $150M Minnesota Ponzi Scam

A Minnesota securities fraud lawsuit, filed by court-appointed receiver R.J. Zayed, contends that because NRP Financial Inc. allegedly failed to properly supervise former broker Jason Bo-Alan Beckman, the brokerage firm ended up assisting in one of the largest Ponzi scams that the state has ever experienced. The $150M financial fraud raised $47.3M from at least 143 clients. Over 900 investors sustained losses as a result of the scam.

Beckman worked as an NRP rep between 2005 and 2008. Last year, he was charged with 13 felony counts related to the alleged financial scheme, including the criminal charges of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, mail fraud, aiding and abetting wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering. He also is accused of stealing $7M from Global Advisors LLC, which he owns.

Minneapolis money manager Trevor Cook is the supposed chief architect of the Minnesota Ponzi scam. (He is serving a 25-year prison after pleading guilty to tax evasion and mail fraud.) Involving foreign currency arbitrage, investors were allegedly told that yearly returns of up to 12% would be earned with little, if any, risk to their principal if they bought into the program. Beckman made representations about the currency program between 2006 and 2009.

Per the Ponzi fraud lawsuit, the scam would have ended sooner if only NPR Financial had properly supervised Beckman, denied transfer of investors’ funds to bank accounts maintained on behalf of shell entities, looked into improper transfers of clients’ monies that Beckman had made, and refused to let him hide his actions behind its name and reputation. A lot of the parties that invested were clients of Oxford Private Client Group LLC, which is not only a NRP Financial branch, but also it is partly owned by Cook and Beckman.

Oberlin Financial, which preceded NRP, is accused of having known
way back in April 2006 that Beckman had another business involving trading currencies. NPR also allegedly was aware that Beckman used marketing collaterals that made an inflated claim that there was $3.5B in assets under management.

National Retirement Partners Inc., which is NRP Financial’s parent, sold its assets to LPL for $27M. When the deal was taking place, LPL touted the buy as a way to get into the retirement and pension market. However, according to an LPL Investment Holdings spokesperson, the company is not named in the securities complaint and has not been liable in this case. The broker-dealer was not one of the assets that LPL Holdings bought from NRP.

B-D that sold assets to LPL played role in $150M scam: Lawsuit, Investment News, January 6, 2012

Patrick Kiley, two others indicted in Trevor Cook ponzi scheme, CityPages, January 6, 2011


More Blog Posts:
SEC Sues SIPC Over R. Allen Stanford Ponzi Payouts, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 20, 2011

SEC Charges Father and Son with Utah Securities Fraud In Alleged $220M Ponzi Scam Over Purported Real Estate Investments, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 15, 2011

SEC Issues Emergency Order to Stop $26M “Green” Ponzi Scam, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, October 13, 2011

Continue reading "Securities Fraud Lawsuit Names NRP Financial Inc. in $150M Minnesota Ponzi Scam" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Financial Firms , NRP Financial Inc. , Ponzi Scams , Securities Fraud

January 6, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission Charges Investment Adviser with Committing Securities Fraud on Linked In

The SEC has charged investment adviser Anthony Fields with selling bogus securities on LinkedIn and other social networking sites. The alleged financial fraud has prompted the agency to put out two alerts warning of the risks that advisory firms and investors must contend with in the social media era.

According to the SEC, Fields used social media sites to offer over $500 billion in fake securities. He used Platinum Securities Brokers and Anthony Fields & Associates, which are his two proprietorships, to make numerous fraudulent offerings. He also allegedly provided misleading and untruthful information about Anthony Fields & Associates’ clients, assets under management, and operational history on the company’s Web site and in filings submitted to the Commission. The SEC claims that Fields did not maintain the necessary records and books, gave the impression that he was a broker-dealer even though he is not SEC-registered, and failed to implement appropriate compliance procedures and policies.

With retail investors turning to LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other online networks to get information about investing, the risks of becoming exposed to fraud are growing. The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy is offering investors a number of tips to avoid financial scams online, including:

• Be careful of unsolicited investment opportunities—especially from someone you don’t know.
• Be wary of any investment opportunity that sounds too good to be true.
• Watch out for “guaranteed returns” – there is no such thing.
• Consider it a “red flag” if you experience any pressure to invest or buy immediately.
• Watch out for affinity scams, which usually target group members.
• Make sure that your privacy is always protected online.
• Ask lots of questions about any investment opportunity.
• Do your due diligence.
• Don’t provide your Social Security number, any account information, or other sensitive data to or on social media Web site.
• Watch out for “friend” requests from financial service providers that you don’t know—remember, once you let them “in,” you are giving them access.
• Pick a solid password and don’t use the same one for multiple accounts.
• Deactivate file sharing.
• Be careful when using public computers or Wi-Fi that is accessible to others.
• Arm your computer with a firewall and antivirus software.
• Log out of your social networking accounts when you are not using them.
• Watch out for unfamiliar links sent to you—especially if you don’t know the sender.
• Make sure your mobile device is secure.

Examples of investment scams that have been known to use the Internet and social media:
• Market manipulation schemes
• Pump-and-dump scams
• Fraud marketed through spam e-mail or online investment newsletters
• High yield investment program scams
• Fraud offerings made online

SEC Charges Illinois-Based Adviser in Social Media Scam Agency Issues Alerts on Social Media Risks for Investors and Firms, SEC, January 4, 2012

Read the SEC's Investor Alert (PDF)

Read the SEC's investor bulletin on understanding your accounts (PDF)


More Blog Posts:
FBI Arrests Texas Leader of Pump-and-Dump Scheme, Stockbroker Fraud, March 23, 2011

Lancer Management Group LLC Hedge Fund Manager Acquitted of Charges He Ran Market Manipulation Scam, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, May 5, 2011

Barclays Capital Ordered by FINRA to Pay $3M Fine For Alleged Subprime Mortgage Securitization-Related Misrepresentations, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, December 23, 2011

Continue reading "Securities and Exchange Commission Charges Investment Adviser with Committing Securities Fraud on Linked In " »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: SEC Enforcement , Securities Fraud

Tags: Social Media Fraud

December 25, 2011

Former-Chicago Bears Wide Receiver Willie Gault Sued by SEC for Securities Scam Involving the Alleged Inflation of Stock Prices

The US Securities and Exchange Commission is suing former NFL football player Will Gault for securities fraud. According to US regulators, he and several others participated in a fraud scam that involved inflating the stock price of Heart Tronics, which is a heart-monitoring device company. Other defendants in the Commission’s case include lawyer Mitchell Stein, Heart Tronics Co-CEO J. Rowland Perkins, and Stein’s driver Martin B. Carter. Investors were bilked of nearly $8 million.

Per the SEC’s complaint, between 2006 and 2008 Heart Tronics repeatedly announced that millions of dollars in (bogus) sales orders for its heart-monitoring devices had been placed. To garner investor confidence, Gault was appointed company president and Co-CEO.

Meantime, Stein, who hired promoters to promote the company’s stock online, allegedly made secret trades. The Commission says he used investors’ money to pay for private jets, a number of homes, and exotic motor vehicles.

Stein is also a defendant in a parallel criminal case filed by the US justice department. In the indictment against him, prosecutors charged him with putting out press releases promoting the fake sales, conspiring to obstruct the SEC probe, and taking part in a financial scam to artificially increase Heart Tronic’s stock price through bogus orders from nonexistent clients.

The Commission says that Perkins and Gault hardly ever asked Stein about his actions, as well as failed to fulfill their fiduciary duties. Gault and Stein are accused of defrauding one investor, in particular, who made a substantial investment in the heart-monitoring device company. That investor's money ended up in Gault’s personal brokerage account.

The SEC is accusing Carter and Stein of generating false documents to support false disclosures that were made to the public. This included sending a letter from a fictitious client in order to deceive auditors, management, and disclosure counsel, as well as sending products to a friend of Carter’s to make it seem as if an actual device was delivered.

The SEC is seeking a permanent bar against Stein, Gault, and Perkins that would prevent them from serving as corporate officers. They also want them to pay financial penalties and give back ill-gotten gains.

Gault was a former University of Tennessee football player who played for the Chicago Bears for 11 seasons. He also belonged to the US Olympic team that boycotted the Summer Games in Moscow in 1980.

Securities Fraud
If you are an investor that was defrauded by people who took advantage of you and took the money for their own personal use and gain, you may have grounds for a securities fraud case.

Ex-NFL Star Willie Gault Sued by SEC in Stock-Pumping Fraud, BusinessWeek, December 23, 2011

SEC Charges California Company, Co-CEOs, and Attorney in Series of Fraudulent Schemes Pumping Company Stock, SEC, December 20, 2011

Read the SEC Complaint (PDF)

More Blog Posts:
Three Investment Advisers Charged with Massachusetts Securities Fraud, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 16, 2011

Colorado Securities Fraud: Universal Consulting Resources LLC and Owner Richard Dalton to Pay $15.8M to Settle SEC Lawsuit Over Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 9, 2011

Former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Executives Face SEC Securities Fraud Charges, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, December 16, 2011

Continue reading "Former-Chicago Bears Wide Receiver Willie Gault Sued by SEC for Securities Scam Involving the Alleged Inflation of Stock Prices" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Investor Fraud , Securities Fraud

December 16, 2011

Three Investment Advisers Charged with Massachusetts Securities Fraud

Massachusetts securities regulators have filed three actions accusing investment advisers of defrauding investors of millions. The cases come as the state is getting ready to oversee even more investment advisers in 2012.

One of the securities fraud actions filed is against unregistered adviser John B. Wilson, who regulators want to ban from the securities industry for life. Wilson is accused of defrauding 25 investors who gave him over $1.5M. The funds were placed in JBW Capital LLC.

Wilson lost over 90% of the funds in 2 trades he made during one month in ‘08. He has admitted to having a trading addiction.

In the second Massachusetts securities case, RIA Daniel A. McKenna allegedly raised over $1M from investors over a 17-year period. He did this by selling shares in Principle Profits Asset Management. In fact, the shares were worthless. He also allegedly persuaded investors to lend his company money, which he never paid back.

Meantime, state regulators are accusing another RIA, Sean Michael O'Brien and Andover Equity Investment Group LLC of using clients’ money to pay for his own expenses, charging “exorbitant” fees, and issuing untrue statements to investigators. For example, he allegedly told the state that TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. division "thinkorswim," which was his custodian broker-dealer, never asked him about his advisory fees. (His management fee was 15.54% even though the average for the industry is .5%-2%.) However, it turns out that TD Ameritrade asked O’Brien about the fees and eventually terminated his use of the company’s platform.

The state wants investors to get their money back. Regulators also want to take back the registrations of both O’Brien and McKenna.

Currently, there are 739 RIA’s under Massachusetts’ watch. Per the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which mandates that midsize investment advisers go from federal to state supervision next year, another 200 more RIA’s will fall under the state’s watch. (Midsize advisers have assets ranging from $25M and $100M).

Referring to these latest securities actions, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin said that they show the state’s willingness to go after investment advisers that have violated securities laws.

Our stockbroker fraud lawyers represent investors throughout the US. If you believe that a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer may have defrauded you, please contact our securities fraud law firm. You may have a Massachusetts securities claim on your hands.

Over the years, Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas LTD LLP has helped thousands of investors throughout the US to recoup their investment. Your first consultation with us is free.


Massachusetts Signals Strict Oversight Of Investment Advisers, The Wall Street Journal, December 14, 2011

Massachusetts charges three advisers with varying flavors of fraud, Investment News, December 18, 2011


More Blog Posts:
Colorado Securities Fraud: Universal Consulting Resources LLC and Owner Richard Dalton to Pay $15.8M to Settle SEC Lawsuit Over Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 9, 2011

LPL Financial Ordered to Pay $100K for Lack of Adequate Oversight that Resulted in Unsuitable Investments for Clients, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 29, 2011

Texas Securities Fraud: Unregistered Adviser Confesses to Selling Almost $400K in Promissory Notes and Investments Despite Cease and Desist Order, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 5, 2011

Continue reading "Three Investment Advisers Charged with Massachusetts Securities Fraud " »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Securities Fraud

December 9, 2011

Colorado Securities Fraud: Universal Consulting Resources LLC and Owner Richard Dalton to Pay $15.8M to Settle SEC Lawsuit Over Ponzi Scam

The Securities and Exchange Commission says that it has resolved its Colorado securities fraud lawsuit against Universal Consulting Resources LLC (UCR) and the financial firm’s owner, Richard Dalton. Per the agreement, both will pay $15,842,948, including a $7,549,458 penalty, over allegations that investors were given materially misleading and false information about the Diamond Program and the Trading Program, which are investment contracts.

According to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, which is where the judgments were entered, Dalton told investors they would get yearly profits of 48-120%. In actuality, he was running a Ponzi scam.

The SEC contends that Dalton raised about $17 million from 130 investors located in 13 US states. He told Trading Program investors that their money would be held in an escrow account with an American bank and that a European trader would use the account’s value to get leveraged funds to buy and sell bank notes. Under the Diamond Program, profits were supposed to come from the trading of diamonds.

In actuality, Dalton used $2.5 million of investor funds for personal expenses. New investors’ money was also used to pay existing investors their investment “profits.”

UCR and Dalton are permanently enjoined from further violations of:

• Securities Act of 1933, sections 17(a) and 5
• Securities Exchange Act of 1934, section 10b
• Rule 10b-5 thereunder

Dalton also is enjoined from violating Exchange Act Section 15(a).

Named as a relief defendant is Marie Dalton, who is Richard’s wife. The SEC claims that she used more than $900,000 in investor money to buy a home in Colorado. The court has ordered her to disgorge $115,000 in investor money.

A few months ago, the couple was charged in criminal court with conspiracy, interstate transportation of stolen funds, and wire fraud.

Ponzi Scams
With hardly (if any at all) actual earnings made, Ponzi scams can collapse suddenly when the money from new investors starts to dry up or too many current investors decide to pull out. Most Ponzi schemes work for as long as they do because investors believe that they are making a real profit rather than just being given other people’s investment money.

According to the SEC, the Daltons stopped issuing payments to investors when they found out they were under investigation. They then continued to tell investors that their payments were coming but had been delayed. For example, investors were led to believe that a plane transporting diamonds was forced to land Holland. Another excuse that investors were given is that 18,000 diamonds turned out to be fake.

SEC RESOLVES FRAUD-BASED LAWSUIT AGAINST DENVER-AREA COMPANY AND ITS OWNER, SEC, December 2, 2011

Golden couple accused of Ponzi scheme, arrested, Business Journal, September 30, 2011


More Blog Posts:
Former Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Employee Faces SEC Charges for Creating Fake Trades to Enable Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 23, 2011

SEC Files Charges in $27M Washington DC Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 21, 2011

SEC Issues Emergency Order to Stop $26M “Green” Ponzi Scam, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, October 13, 2011

Continue reading "Colorado Securities Fraud: Universal Consulting Resources LLC and Owner Richard Dalton to Pay $15.8M to Settle SEC Lawsuit Over Ponzi Scam " »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Ponzi Scams , Securities Fraud

November 29, 2011

LPL Financial Ordered to Pay $100K for Lack of Adequate Oversight that Resulted in Unsuitable Investments for Clients

LPL Financial must pay $100K for its improper supervision of a broker. The Oregon Division of Financial and Corporate Securities, which fined the financial firm, reports that LPL Financial has put in place better oversight procedures since the violation was discovered. LPL Financial is a LPL Investment Holdings Inc. division.

According to the state’s securities division, Jack Kleck, an LPL Financial branch manager, sold risky gas and oil partnership-related investments to almost 36 residents. A lot of these clients were elderly seniors for whom these investments were unsuitable (considering their investment goals and age). Some even lacked the mental capacity to make such investment choices.

LPL Financial is accused of committing securities law violations, including not making sure that company procedures and policy were enforced and inadequately supervising Kleck, whose securities license was taken away in 2007. He was ordered to pay a $30,000 fine.

Among the steps that LPL has taken to set up better supervisory and compliance practices are having more employees focus on these responsibilities, improving branch office exams, and increasing the pre-sale evaluation of transactions.

Our securities fraud lawyers are talking to people who sustained losses because of Kleck or another LPL Financial representative. Contact Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas LLP today.

Unfortunately, elderly seniors and persons who are mentally impaired are easy targets for securities fraud. These investors may not fully understand what they are getting into and they can place their trust in the wrong registered representative. Often, the risks resulting from stockbroker fraud are too much for these clients, who may want to be conservative about their investment goals in order to ensure that they have enough money to support themselves. At this point in their lives, they cannot afford any huge losses.

It is the responsibility of financial firms to properly supervise their employees so that securities fraud doesn’t take place. They must also have the proper supervisory and compliance procedures in place so that employees can execute them.

Our senior investor fraud lawyers know how devastating it can be to find out the nest egg you’ve spent your whole life growing is now gone because someone made investments on your behalf that were inappropriate.

Examples of Financial Scams that Commonly Target Seniors:
• Investment scams
• Reverse mortgage schemes
• Ponzi scams
• Internet fraud

Ways to Avoid Financial Fraud:
• Don’t sign up right way. Take the time to think about the investment and whether it would benefit you.
• Do research on the broker and the financial firm to make they are legitimate. Have they been accused of securities fraud before?
• Consult with a family member or a friend about the investment.
• Make sure you know what you are getting involved in. If you don't understand any details, ask and make sure you get answers.

Oregon fines LPL Financial $100,000 for failing to properly supervise rural broker-dealer, Oregon Live, November 22, 2011

Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas Investigates Claims Against LPL Financial in Light of $100k Fine for Supervisory Oversight, Globe Newswire, November 30, 2011


More Blog Posts:
LPL Financial Management and Private Equity Backers TPG and Hellman & Friedman Could Make Over $450M from IPO, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 19, 2010

Linsco Private Ledger Clients File FINRA Arbitration Claims Accusing Former Financial Adviser Raymond Londo of Running Multi-Million Dollar Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, April 13, 2011

Wells Investment Securities Agrees to $300,000 Fine by FINRA for Alleged Use of Misleading Marketing Materials for REIT Offerings, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, November 23, 2011


Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Financial Firms , Inadequate Supervision , LPL Financial , Securities Fraud , Senior Investors

November 23, 2011

Former Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Employee Faces SEC Charges for Creating Fake Trades to Enable Ponzi Scam

David Kugel, who was a long time Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BMIS), has been charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with fraud. Kugel is accused of making fake trades to keep Madoff’s multi-billion dollar Ponzi scam running. He has consented to settling the securities fraud charges.

The SEC claims that Kugel, who worked for Madoff for nearly 40 years, was asked by the Ponzi mastermind to turn backdated arbitrage trade information into fake trades. Kugel’s own BMIS account included backdated trades. While some of the trades imitated successful ondx made by Kugel for BMIS, others were founded on historical facts that he got from old newspapers.

Over a number of years Kugel even withdrew almost $10 million in profits from these bogus trades in his own BMIS. SEC New York Regional Office George S. Canellos claims that Kugel knew such profits were fake.

Two other people accused of setting up fake trades from the information that Kugel provided were Joann Crupi and Annette Bongiorno. Both allegedly asked him for backdated data about trades that added up to millions of dollars. They would then take the information and design trades that equaled those figures. These bogus trades showed up as trade confirmations on investors’ account statements.

The SEC filed securities charges against the two women last year. The Commission claims that Bongiorno regularly set up bogus books and records and misled investors via phone calls, trade confirmations, and account statements. She also is accused of setting up false trades in her own BMIS counts that allowed her to cash out millions of dollars more than what was put in. Meantime, Crupi was accused of deciding what accounts to cash out and which investors should receive checks as Madoff’s scam stood on the brink of collapse. The two women are facing criminal charges over their alleged involvement. They have denied any wrongdoing.

Prosecutors have filed parallel criminal charges against Kugel. On Monday, he pleaded guilty to six criminal counts, including securities fraud, conspiracy, and bank fraud. He will be sentenced in May.

Meantime, Irving Picard, who has been appointed as the trustee in charge of helping Madoff’s Ponzi victims from recouping their losses, is seeking at least $22.2 million from Kugel and his family.

Ponzi Scams
A Ponzi scheme can be described as a multi-level marketing operation. The director solicits investments while promising clients a given return rate. However, rather than paying investors from real profits, the principal from new investors is used to compensate earlier investors. Ponzi scams can result in devastating losses for investors once the money dries up.

SEC Charges Longtime Madoff Employee With Creating Fake Trades, SEC, November 21, 2011

Read the SEC Complaint (PDF)

Bernie Madoff Cronies Arrested, ABC News, November 18, 2010

More Blog Posts:
SEC Files Charges in $27M Washington DC Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 21, 2011

Former Texan and First Capital Savings and Loan To Pay $4.5M for Alleged Foreign Currency Ponzi Scheme, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 11, 2011

SEC Issues Emergency Order to Stop $26M “Green” Ponzi Scam, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, October 13, 2011

Continue reading "Former Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Employee Faces SEC Charges for Creating Fake Trades to Enable Ponzi Scam" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities , Ponzi Scams , Securities Fraud

November 19, 2011

Oppenheimer Funds Investors Can Proceed with Their Securities Fraud Lawsuit

A federal court has decided that Oppenheimer municipal bond fund holders can go ahead with their securities fraud complaint against Oppenheimer Funds. The plaintiffs of In re Oppenheimer Rochester Funds Group Securities Litigation are alleging federal securities law violations. Funds involved included:

• AMT-Free Municipals Fund
• Rochester National Municipals Fund
• AMT-Free New York Municipals Fund
• Rochester Fund Municipals
• California Municipal Fund
• Pennsylvania Municipal Fund
• New Jersey Municipal Fund

The shareholders of seven municipal bonds had their securities fraud lawsuits consolidated into one case in two years ago. They are claiming that the Oppenheimer Funds neglected to reveal in their registration and prospectus statements that risks were being taken that weren’t in line with their declared strategy and investment goals. The investors argued that even as the funds explicitly said that preserving capital was a clear investment goal, the true objective was one of “high-risk, high-return.” Seeing as certain market conditions were foreseeable, the shareholders believe this placed their capital at great, undisclosed risk, which did come to fruition during the credit crisis of 2007-2008. This is when the Funds’ holding in highly leveraged, complex securities set off cash reserve and payment duties that required for the assets be sold under conditions that most likely were not to the funds’ advantage. The plaintiffs say that because of this, the funds underperformed compared to other municipal bond funds.

They are also claiming that the significant drop in the Funds’ shares’ values can be linked to the deviations between the stated and actual objectives. After investors were notified in October and November 2008 via prospectus supplements of what the Funds’ investments true liquidity risks were, share prices then went crashing. The net asset value of the 7 funds dropped by about 30-50% that year while similar municipal bonds only went down by 10-15%.

The defendants moved to dismiss the consolidate case, claiming that the investors’ losses were triggered by the credit crisis and not because of what was written (or not included) in the funds’ prospectuses. They also argued that they were making a forward-looking statement when they made the “preservation of capital” a goal and had adequately disclosed the risks involved.

In the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, the federal judge turned down the Defendants’ motion to toss out the consolidated lawsuits. Judge John L. Kane, Jr. also rejected their claim that federal securities laws exempts mutual funds from liability because drops in those funds’ value are a result of corresponding downturns in the funds’ investments’ value and not of statements (whether true or false) in their prospectuses.

Oppenheimer Rochester Funds Lose Dismissal Bid, Face Trial, Bloomberg/Business Week, October 25, 2011

Oppenheimer Muni Bond Investors May Sue Over Alleged Misstatements in Prospectuses, BNA Securities Law Daily, October 26, 2011


More Blog Posts:
8/31/11 is Deadline for Opting Out of $100M Oppenheimer Mutual Funds Class Action Settlement, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 17, 2011

Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund Resulted In Significant Financial Losses for Investors from Citigroup, UBS, Merrill Lynch, and Other Large Financial Firms, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 16, 2010

Chase Investment Services Corporation Ordered by FINRA to Pay Back $1.9M for Unsuitable Sales of Floating-Rate Loan Funds and UITs, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, November 19, 2011

Continue reading "Oppenheimer Funds Investors Can Proceed with Their Securities Fraud Lawsuit" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Financial Firms , Oppenheimer , Securities Fraud

November 15, 2011

AARP Offers Older Investors 5 Warning Signs for Avoiding the Next Major Ponzi Scam

The AARP has issued a fraud protection bulletin warning investors how to avoid becoming the victim of whoever happens to be peddling the next Ponzi scheme. Unfortunately, older investors are among the favorite prey of financial fraudsters. According Investor Protection Trusts CEO Don Blandin, one in five people in the 65 and over age group have already been exploited. Millions more are at risk.

To help investors, AARP has put out a description of five red flags warning of a possible financial scam:

1) The broker-adviser tells you that you wouldn’t be able to access your money during a “lock-up” period.

2) You feel pressure to invest now due to limited space or for some other reason. Give yourself time to do your own due diligence, make sure that the investment is legitimate, or seek the advice of others.

3) Sales pitches with a news hook. The North American Securities Administrators Association reports that in the last year alone, the leading financial frauds involved precious metal investments and distressed real estate, both involved topics that made headlines.

4) Investors that are being targeted belong to a group whose members may be possibly cognitively impaired, including elderly seniors that live alone (in particular, women).

5) Questionable marketing tactics, such as direct mail, telemarketing, and affinity pitches.

In the AARP’s bulletin, Louis Straney, a securities fraud expert who wrote the Investor’s Guide to Loss Recovery, says that it always a good idea to talk to a third party when considering an investment proposal. He also warns that just because the party making the proposal has a fancy office doesn’t mean that the investment is a legitimate one. He also recommends inquiring about an investment adviser’s qualifications and background.

According to a Special Report from InvestorProtection.org, financial abuse fraud is the 21st century crime. Sometimes the victims are part of a fraud scam targeting multiple seniors. On other occasions, incidents of financial abuse involve one particular target. One need only look at the case of socialite Brooke Astor. While she suffered from Alzheimer’s her son sought to steal her $187 million fortune. That said, one doesn’t have to be as rich as Astor to be targeted. Elderly seniors are defrauded of almost $3 billion a year and this doesn’t include the cases that go unreported.

Throughout the US, our stockbroker fraud lawyers represent elderly investors that have lost money because of broker or investment adviser misconduct. For many elderly people, the loss of their investments is the depletion of their live savings and the end to the security they sought to provide for themselves. Financial fraud of the elderly is a crime and it is also elder abuse.

There may be a way to recover your losses. Contact our stockbroker fraud law firm. Our AARP securities lawyers are dedicated to helping investors get their money back.

Fraud Protection: Avoid the Next Madoff, AARP, November 8, 2011

The Crime of the 21st Century, Investor Protection

Seniors, FBI


More Blog Posts:
Two Texas Men Sentenced For $100 Million Life Settlement Scam that Bilked Over 800 Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 4, 2011

Elder Investors Suffering From Alzheimer’s Make Perfect Targets for Securities Fraud, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 8, 2011

Wedbush Securities Ordered by FINRA to Pay $2.8M in Senior Financial Fraud Case Over Variable Annuities, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 31, 2011

SEC Issues Emergency Order to Stop $26M “Green” Ponzi Scam, Institutional Investors Securities Blog, October 13, 2011

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Securities Fraud , Senior Investors

November 10, 2011

SEC and DOJ Charge Two Florida Men With Free Riding Securities Scam

Two Florida men are accused of defrauding investors and broker-dealers by allegedly not telling them that they didn’t have enough money or securities to pay for their stock trades. The US Justice Department is charging Scott Kupersmith with securities fraud and wire fraud, while the Securities and Exchange Commission is charging him and Frederick Chelly with involvement in a front-running scam to trade free of risk at the expense of broker-dealers.

The U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey claims that Kupersmith engaged in free riding, which happens if a client sells or purchases securities in a brokerage account while lacking the money or securities to cover the trades. Kupersmith and his associates are believed to have facilitated the securities scam by setting up several brokerage accounts at financial firms in New Jersey and outside the state.

In addition to falsely representing himself as having a personal net worth of approximately $5 million, Kupersmith is also accused of made it appear as if he ran a Manhattan hedge fund with assets of up to $20 million. These misrepresentations allowed him to raise about $500,000 of investor monies, which he then used to cover personal expenses or pay principal and interest payments to earlier investors in this Ponzi-like scam.

The SEC says that Kupersmith and Chelly’s scam caused financial fraud allowed them to make $600K in illegal trading profit while broker-dealers lost more than $2 million as a result. The Commission says that the two men presented themselves as private investors or money managers.

They allegedly set up a number of accounts for corporate entities under their control in brokerage firms while buying/selling the same amount of the same stock in various accounts. Often, this would happen during the course of one day and with the intention of making money from the changes in stock price. The SEC says that Kupermith and Chelly would take the profits from the trades but that when substantial losses were likely, they wouldn’t pay able to cover sales they had asked for, which caused broker-dealers to take the losses.

The two men also falsely made it appear as if they had assets with a third-party custody bank even though they didn’t own the stock that they were selling and often didn’t have enough money to pay for the stock that they did buy. Share sale proceeds were then used to buy the same shares.

The two men used Delivery Versus Payment/Receipt Versus Payment accounts at the broker-dealers to trade. Te financial firms offered these accounts to the two men because they were under the impression that Kupersmith and Chelly had the money to cover their trades.

Read the SEC's Complaint (PDF)


More Blog Posts:
Former Deloitte Tax LP Partner’s Wife Settles Insider Trading Charges for $1M, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, November 8, 2011

Houston Judge Overturns $9.2M Securities Fraud Ruling Against Morgan Keegan, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 11, 2011

Banco Espirito Santo S.A. Settles for $7M SEC Charges Alleging Violations of Investment Adviser, Broker-Dealer, and Securities Transaction Registration Requirements, Institutional Investors Securities Blog, November 5, 2011

Continue reading "SEC and DOJ Charge Two Florida Men With Free Riding Securities Scam" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: SEC Enforcement , Securities Fraud

November 8, 2011

Former Deloitte Tax LP Partner’s Wife Settles Insider Trading Charges for $1M

The Securities and Exchange Commission says that Annabel McClellan has settled for $1M insider trading allegations that she and her husband gave relatives confidential information about merger deals. Annabel is the wife of Arnold McClellan, who used to be a partner at Deloitte Tax LP where he was head of the mergers and acquisitions teams.

If a federal judge approves the securities fraud settlement, the SEC will dismiss the claims against Arnold. By agreeing to settle, Annabel is not denying or admitting to the securities charges.

Per the SEC, Annabel used confidential information that she got from her husband to tip her brother-in-law James Sander and her sister Miranda. These family members then allegedly used this knowledge to make trades before the transactions (usually involved pending acquisitions and mergers) were announced to the public. This allowed them to make millions in illicit profits.

In addition to the civil penalty, Annabel has agreed to permanent enjoinment from violating Securities Exchange Act of 1934’s Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. She also earlier pleaded guilty to obstructing the SEC’s probe into the insider trading scam after admitted to making false statements related to the investigation. Annabel maintains that her husband knew nothing about her activities.

The McClellans were charged with insider trading by the SEC last year following a parallel probe by the Commission, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the Department of Justice (DOJ, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). According to the SEC’s complaint, at least seven times between 2006 and 2008, Arnold McClellan revealed confidential information to his wife, who then passed on what she knew to Miranda and James in London.

James, who owns a trading company, would then buy derivative financial instruments. He also took financial positions in US companies that were acquisition targets. When Arnold would find out that some of the deals were not certain, James would liquidate his positions. The Commission says that the trades were closely timed with phone calls made between the two sisters, as well as in-person visits between the couples. By 2008, James allegedly made over £1.5 million from the tips and his financial firm’s clients and colleagues made over £10 million.

Insider Trading
Insider trading hurts the stock market, affects investor confidence, and causes financial harm to the companies whose confidential information was used to benefit a few. Insider trading is a breach of fiduciary duty or another kind of relationship of confidence and trust. The person tipping, the one being tipped, and anyone who has access to the insider information that makes the trade can be charged with insider trading.

Read the SEC Complaint Against the McClellans, SEC

Wife of former Deloitte partner to pay $1 million, SFGate, October 18, 2011

FSA, SEC and DoJ investigation leads to two people being charged by the SEC with insider dealing in the U.S., Financial Services Authority, December 1, 2010


More Blog Posts:
Ex-Goldman Sachs Director Rajat Gupta Pleads Not Guilty to Insider Trading Charges, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 26, 2011

Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban's Allegations of Misconduct Against the SEC Enforcement Staff are Without Merit, Says Inspector General’s Report, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 28, 2011

Insider Trading: Former FrontPoint Partners Hedge Fund Manager Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, August 20, 2011

Continue reading "Former Deloitte Tax LP Partner’s Wife Settles Insider Trading Charges for $1M" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Insider Trading , SEC Enforcement , Securities Fraud

October 5, 2011

SEC & DOJ File Charges Against San Francisco Investment Adviser For Alleged “Soft Dollar” Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission is suing investment adviser Kurt Hovan for allegedly misappropriating $178K in “soft dollars” that he claimed was used for investment research. The federal agency contends that, in fact, the money was used to cover other business-related expenses. When Kurt, as Hovan Capital Management president, was asked to provide documents supporting this, he generated bogus research reports. Meantime, the US Department of Justice is charging the 43-year-old with obstruction and mail fraud.

Soft dollars are rebates or credits. They come from brokerage firms on commissions for trades made in investment adviser’s client accounts. If the soft dollar credits are disclosed appropriately, the IA may keep the credits and use them to cover expenses related to a specific area research and brokerage services benefiting clients.

The SEC contends, however, that Kurt didn’t solely use the soft dollars for research services. Instead, $166,667 was used to pay for the salary of his brother Edward Hovan. Soft dollars were also used to pay for computer hardware and office rent. Edward and Kurt’s wife Lisa Hovan (Hovan Capital Management’s chief financial officer) are also named in the SEC’s complaint. The SEC is accusing all three of them for violating federal securities laws’ antifraud provisions. Kurt Hovan and HCM are also accused of recordkeeping violations.

The securities lawsuit also claims that conceal their soft dollar-related activities, Kurt, Lisa, and Edward set up a "Bolton Research,” which was a shell company that Edward Hovan secretly controlled. The company then billed Hovan Capital Management’s brokerage companies for research that was never conducted. Edward allegedly kicked back $65,000 of payments to Kurt and Lisa.

The allegedly false reporting to the SEC is said to have taken place during a January 2010 examination of HCM. Staff requested that the financial firm give over copies of the research reports that Bolton Research had prepared. Instead, Kurt allegedly gave the SEC phony research reports and doctored materials.

The SEC is seeking disgorgement with prejudgment interest, injunctive relief, and other financial penalties.

Securities Fraud
As you can see, securities charges and criminal charge can be filed against an investment adviser that commits securities fraud. You may want to file your own securities fraud lawsuit to recover your losses if you lost money because investment adviser misconduct was a factor.

Our securities fraud law firm knows that the thought of pursuing a financial firm to get your money back can be an overwhelming process, which is why you want to retain an experienced investment fraud lawyer that knows how to successfully pursue your recovery while protecting your rights.

SEC CHARGES BAY AREA INVESTMENT ADVISER FOR DEFRAUDING CLIENTS AND FALSIFYING DOCUMENTS DURING SEC EXAM, SEC, September 28, 2011

Belvedere investment adviser faces criminal charges in fraud case, Marin Independent Journal, September 28, 2011


More Blog Posts:
New Jersey Investment Adviser Who Pleaded Guilty to $11.5M Financial Fraud Gets 168-Month Prison Sentence, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 29, 2011

Investors Working with Incompetent Registered Investment Advisers Have Few Protections, Reports Bloomberg, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 11, 2011

Custodial Firms Get Tougher About Registered Investment Adviser Compliance, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 28, 2010

Continue reading "SEC & DOJ File Charges Against San Francisco Investment Adviser For Alleged “Soft Dollar” Fraud" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Investment Advisers , Securities Fraud

September 29, 2011

New Jersey Investment Adviser Who Pleaded Guilty to $11.5M Financial Fraud Gets 168-Month Prison Sentence

Sandra Venetis, a New Jersey investment adviser has been sentenced to 168 months behind bars. Venetis had entered guilty pleas to che charges of securities fraud and transacting in criminal property. She also must pay $11,579,781 in restitution to the investors she defrauded.

The government had accused Venetis, who owns Systematic Financial Associates Inc., of soliciting her financial firm’s clients so that they would put their money in an “alternative investment program” that she ran separate from her registered investment advisory business. This was between 1997 and 2010. To get these clients to invest, she falsely told them the money was being used to pay for loans for doctors’ quarterly pension funds. There were even occasions when Venetis would tell these clients to liquidate their positions in securities so they could take part in her alternate program. 114 clients sent her about $16.7M.

None of the investors’ money went to any doctors—although she did make up fictitious physicians and forged real doctors’ names on promissory notes to make it look as if she was using her clients’ money in the manner promised. Venetis has admitted that not only did she not run a legitimate alternative investment program, but also that she created Systematic Financial Services Inc. so that she could run her financial scam. She acknowledges that she used some of the investor money to help cover her advisory’s operation costs.

It was last year that Venetis and three of her firms, Systematic Financial Services, LLC, Systematic Financial Services, Inc., and Systematic Financial Associates, Inc., settled SEC charges over the multimillion-dollar financial fraud. The Commission said that Venetis and her companies violated sections of the Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Relief defendants included Venetis LLC, which Venetis also owned and operated, her brother Kevin Persley, and her daughter Jennifer Venetis.

The Commission accused Venetis of telling investors that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation had guaranteed promissory notes that would make about 6-11% tax-free interest annually. Although investors believed their investments were paying for loans to doctors the money paid for Venetis’s business debts and personal spending, including travel abroad, property taxes, home mortgages, gambling, and money for relatives.

Venetis and the companies settled the charges and all agreed to the relief sought by the SEC, including enjoinment from future securities law violation, payment of disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, financial penalties, and appointment of an independent monitor.

N.J. IA Sentenced to 168 Months After Pleading Guilty in $11.5M Fraud, BNA Securities Law Daily, September 12, 2011

SEC CHARGES NEW JERSEY INVESTMENT ADVISER IN MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR OFFERING FRAUD, SEC, September 2, 2010


More Blog Posts:
FINRA Tells Congress It Is Ready to Act as SRO for Investment Advisors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 13, 2011

Investors Working with Incompetent Registered Investment Advisers Have Few Protections, Reports Bloomberg, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 11, 2011

Harvest Managers, Benchmark Asset Managers, and Investment Advisor to Pay $11.6 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Allegedly Mishandled Client Funds, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, July 23, 2011

SEC Extends Temporary Rule Allowing Principal Trades by Investment Advisers Registered as Broker-Dealers, Institutional Investment Fraud Blog, January 13, 2011


Continue reading "New Jersey Investment Adviser Who Pleaded Guilty to $11.5M Financial Fraud Gets 168-Month Prison Sentence" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Investment Advisers , Securities Fraud

September 28, 2011

EagleEye Asset Management LLC Sued by SEC and CFTC for Alleged Forex Trading Scam

In separate securities lawsuits, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are both suing EagleEye Asset Management LLC, which a Massachusetts asset management firm, and Jeffrey A. Liskov, its principal.

The CFTC is accusing the two defendants of defrauding at least one US-based client while trading forex on a margined or leveraged basis for her. Per the CFTC’s lawsuit, the client decided to grant permission to EagleEye and Liskov to trade part of her retirement money because Liskov allegedly advised her that this type of trading was appropriate for her conservative investment objects.

However, Liskov allegedly did not warn her of the risks involved or tell her that he did not have a successful track record with forex trading. While the trading did generate short-term profits for the woman, she lost most of the money that she invested. The CFTC contends that instead of revealing the trading losses, Liskov allegedly forged the client’s name and set up a new account opening documents and on more than $3 million in secret wire transfers from her mutual fund account to her forex account so that trading wouldn’t have to stop. The woman client lost more than $3.24 million, while Liskov and EagleEye made about $235,000 in performance incentive fees.

Per the SEC, between 4/08 and 8/10, Liskov made misrepresentations to clients to persuade them to move funds they’d placed in securities investments into forex trading. The SEC contends that these investments were not appropriate for elderly clients that had conservative investment objectives and that this caused them to sustain significant financial losses totaling almost $4 million. EagleEye and Liskov allegedly earned performed fees of over $300K, plus management fees. The Commission believes that having clients make short-term investment gains and then earning performance fees before these gains were lost was the defendants’ plan.

Liskov allegedly did not even help some investors understand the nature of forex trading. With other clients, he deemphasized the degree of investment risk involved. The SEC also says that Liskov made false statements with claims that he had achieved success with forex trades when, in fact, the opposite was the case.

Meantime, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Francis Galvin (D) has also filed administrative charges against the investment advisor firm and Liskov. Galvin is accusing them of violating Massachusetts’s Uniform Securities Act.

Our securities fraud law firm has helped thousand of investors recoup their losses caused by broker misconduct and investment adviser fraud. Working with a stockbroker fraud law firm is the best way to help you get back your lost investment.

Read the SEC's Complaint (PDF)

CFTC Charges Massachusetts Man Jeffrey Liskov and His Company, EagleEye Asset Management, LLC, with Committing a $3 Million Forex Fraud, CFTC, September 8, 2011

State files complaint against local investment advisor, WickedLocal, September 13, 2011

Mass. Adviser Sued by Regulators Over Alleged Forex Trading Scheme, BNA Securities Law Daily, September 9, 2011


More Blog Posts:
Texas Commodity Trading Advisor FIN FX LLC Now Subject to NFA Emergency Enforcement Action, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, April 27, 2011

Commodity Options Fraud Charges by CFTC Prompts District Court to Freeze Assets and Records of 20/20 Trading Co. Inc. & 20/20 Precious Metals Inc., Stockbroker Fraud Blog, May 6, 2011

$63 Million Mortgage-Backed Securities Lawsuit Against Bank of America is Second One Filed by Western and Southern Life Insurance Co. Against the Financial Firm, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, August 29, 2011

Continue reading "EagleEye Asset Management LLC Sued by SEC and CFTC for Alleged Forex Trading Scam" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: CFTC , Fraudulent Trading , SEC Enforcement , Securities Fraud

September 16, 2011

Five Broker-Dealers Fined by FINRA Over Allegedly Misrepresenting Commissions as Fees to Clients

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has issued fines against broker-dealers Pointe Capital, Inc., John Thomas Financial, First Midwest Securities, Inc., A&F Financial Securities, Inc., and Salomon Whitney LLC for allegedly mischaracterizing part of their commission charges to clients and calling them service handling fees, This caused the amount of total commissions that clients were charged to be understated. As a result, the fees for handling-related services ended up costing clients more.

FINRA says trade commissions and fee schedules should clearly reflect the actual commission charges, which shouldn’t be disguised.

Among the sanctions issued by FINRA:

• A $60,000 fine against Salomon Whitney LLC. FINRA accused the financial firm is accused of charging clients handling service fees of up to $69.95/trade plus commission. FINRA contends that Salomon Whitney did not tell its Connecticut clients that part of the transactional handling fee was a profit to the financial firm, the fee was not determined by the costs of handing a specific transaction, and certain clients were fined lower fees. FINRA believes the handling fee charged by Salmon Whitney was unreasonable. By agreeing to settle, the financial firm is not denying or admitting to the findings.

• First Midwest Securities, Inc. was fined $150,000. The financial firm is accused of charging clients up to $99.75/trade plus commission. FINRA says that this “handling fee” was in fact a commission and not reasonably connected to any direct handling services conducted by First Midwest Securities. The SRO notes that some customers even paid handling fees that were double of what other First Midwest Clients paid. FINRA also says that First Midwest Securities committed other violations, including having inadequately written supervisory procedures and “unfair and unreasonable” markdowns and markups. The financial firm has settled the securities case but is not admitting to or denying FINRA’s allegations.

• FINRA charged A&F Financial Securities, Inc. a $125,000 fine for charging clients an up to $65/trade handling fee, as well as commission. FINRA says that A & F acted inaccurately and improperly. FINRA also accused the financial firm of failing to comply with continuing education requirements, having inadequate supervisory system and procedures, and not properly assessing its training needs or developing and executing a written training plan. A & F also admitted to the findings without denying or admitting to them.

• FINRA fined John Thomas Financial A $275,000 fine for its up to $75/trade handling fee plus commissions. The SRO is also alleging other violations, including deficiencies related to complaint reporting, supervisory controls and certifications, and branch office supervision and recordkeeping. FINRA says the broker-dealer effected key changes to its business without obtaining its approval. John Thomas Financial agreed to settle but did not deny/admit to the findings.

• Pointe Capital, Inc. was fined $300,00 for charging an up to $95//trade handling fee plus commission. FINRA contends that seeing as the “handling” charge wasn’t reasonably linked to actual handling-related services/expenses, the clients were actually charged another commission. Pointe Capital has settled the case.

FINRA Fines Five Broker Dealers for Improper Handling Fees, FINRA, September 7, 2011


More Blog Posts:
FINRA Tells Congress It Is Ready to Act as SRO for Investment Advisor, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 13, 2011

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Alerts Investors About Gold Stock Scams, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 25, 2011

Wedbush Ordered By FINRA Panel To Pay $3.5M to Trader Over Withheld Compensation, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, July 16, 2011

Continue reading "Five Broker-Dealers Fined by FINRA Over Allegedly Misrepresenting Commissions as Fees to Clients" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Securities Fraud

September 7, 2011

“Investor’s Guide to Loss Recovery” Offers Key Information on How to Use Conflict Resolution to Get Your Assets Back

For many investors seeking to recover their lost assets from a Wall Street financial firm, the process can be daunting and confusing. This is why it is so important that you work with a stockbroker fraud law firm that can take you through process, knows how to successfully navigate the legal system, will protect your rights, and is committed to helping you recoup your losses. That said, any understanding you can acquire about the financial recovery process could only help your case, while also alleviating some of your concerns. The “Investor’s Guide to Loss Recovery” by Louis Straney is a reliable resource containing knowledgeable advice and guidance about the arbitration system, how it operates, and how to make it work in your favor.

The book offers detailed coverage and practical information about:

• Key litigation resources and strategies
• How to file an effective claim, as well as the outcomes you can expect
• Scripts of initial lawyer interviews, mediation, and arbitration
• How to organize the massive amount of documents that will be exchanged between parties
• Interviews with securities attorneys, investors, and experts
• An explanation of how new regulatory reforms are impacting the financial recovery process, as well as the options that are available to victims of financial fraud
• Charts demonstrating the major areas of litigation
• Empirical evidence about the growing awareness of investment misconduct

With over 30 years of experience working on Wall Street as a senior manager and director, Straney is an expert guide. He launched his own securities litigation consulting practice in 2007. In addition to having consulted or testified in over 200 engagements, Straney is the author of "Securities Fraud: Detection, Prevention and Control" and other works. He also is a published contributor whose writing has appeared in a number of publications, including the New York Times and the Public Investor Arbitration Bar Association Law Journal.

Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP Founder and Securities Fraud Attorney William Shepherd has this to say about Straney: “I have worked with Lou Straney for many years on cases representing clients who have lost money because of securities fraud and other wronging by those who sold the securities. I have also appeared with him in speaking engagements regarding securities fraud. Although we only met about five years ago, each of us had worked for decades for large Wall Street securities firms. Lou and I have discussed for many hours the steady erosion of character and standards in that industry. In his book, Lou covers this and other subjects. As a non-lawyer, his comprehension of legal issues is surprising. But, as a non-youth, Lou’s incredible level of energy is what amazes me the most.”

Securities Fraud Research and Training

By the Book on Amazon.com


More Blog Posts:
SEC Charges Filed in $22M Ponzi Scam that Targeted Florida Teachers and Retirees, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 29, 2011

Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and Former Executive Faces SEC Charges Over Sale of CDOs to Five Wisconsin School Districts, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 10, 2011

Ex-UBS Financial Adviser Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Private Fund Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, July 13, 2011

Continue reading "“Investor’s Guide to Loss Recovery” Offers Key Information on How to Use Conflict Resolution to Get Your Assets Back " »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Miscellaneous , Securities Fraud

August 29, 2011

SEC Charges Filed in $22M Ponzi Scam that Targeted Florida Teachers and Retirees

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed securities charges against James Davis Risher and Daniel Joseph Sebastian. The two men are accused of running a Ponzi scam that raised over $22 million from over 100 investors. Many of the victims were Florida retirees and teachers that entrusted the two men with their life savings.

Charges against Sebastian and Risher include two counts of fraud in the sale or offer of securities, unregistered securities sales, fraud related to the sale or purchase of securities, investment adviser fraud, and violations of aiding and abetting. This would include alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

According to the SEC, the two men ran a bogus private equity fund and lured people in by promising 14-124% investment gains. The fake account was called "The Preservation of Principal Fund." Investors fake bogus account statements claiming high returns. Also, money being brought in from new investors was used to pay the older investors. The names that Sebastian and Risher used to market the fund were Safe Harbor Private Equity Fund, Preservation of Principal Fund, and Managed Capital Fund.

From January 2007 through July 2010, Sebastian allegedly gave out materials to potential investors. $100,000 was the supposed minimum that one could invest. Even though only $3.8 million of the money they raised was actually invested, the two men allegedly paid themselves more than $16 million in bogus performance and management fees.

RIsher, who is accused of spending over $140,000 of the money on designer jewelry, cars, and artwork, allegedly told investors that he was experienced in wealth and asset management and trading equities when, in fact, he did not have this experience and had spent 11 years of the last two decades behind bars.

Meantime, Sebastian allegedly approached former customers that he worked with when he was an insurance broker. In addition to seniors and teachers, he also targeted church members, as well as investors outside Florida and in Canada.

The SEC is accusing the two men of making misrepresentations and omissions to clients about the fund’s investment strategy, returns, risks involved, audited financial statements, and Risher’s criminal past. Sebastian allegedly even told investors that they couldn't lose their principal investments and gave some of them written guarantees that any losses would be reimbursed.

The FBI, the IRS, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the US Postal Inspection Service, and the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation all investigated this Florida financial scam. In the related criminal case, Risher has pleaded guilty to money laundering and mail fraud. He faces up to 50 years in prison. However, because he cooperated with federal authorities on this case, his punishment may not be so severe.

Risher also has prior criminal convictions for securities fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering. In 1990, he pleaded guilty to violating Georgia’s securities act, as well as multiple counts of theft.


Related Web Resources:
SEC Charges Two Florida Men in Ponzi Scheme Defrauding Teachers and Retirees, SEC, August 29, 2011

James Risher pleads guilty in $21 million Florida Ponzi scheme, WTSP, August 30, 2011

Two named in $22 mil. ponzi scheme case, News Chief, August 31, 2011


More Blog Posts:
Texas Securities Fraud: Ex-Triton Financial CEO Convicted of Ponzi Scam that Bilked Ex-Heisman Trophy Winner Ty Detmer, Other Former NFL Players, and Hundreds of Other Investors of of Millions, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 22, 2011

Even as Ponzi Schemers Serve Time Behind Bars, Investors Are Left Coping with Millions in Financial Losses, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, January 25, 2011

Madoff Trustee Files Securities Lawsuit Against Safra National Bank of New York Seeking to Recover Almost $111.7M for Ponzi Scam Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, May 12, 2011

Continue reading "SEC Charges Filed in $22M Ponzi Scam that Targeted Florida Teachers and Retirees" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Ponzi Scams , Securities Fraud , Senior Investors

August 23, 2011

California Insider Trading Charges Filed by SEC Against Ex-Investment Fund Associate Accused of Making 3000% Profit on Marvel Call Options in Disney Acquisition

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed insider trading charges against Toby G. Scammell, who is accused of making more than $192,000 from insider trading information he received from his girlfriend about Walt Disney Company’s impending acquisition of Marvel Entertainment. Scammell, a 26-year-old ex-investment fund associate, made a more than 3000% profit in less than a month after he bought highly speculative Marvel call options for under $5500 and then sold them after the announcement of the acquisition was made on August 31, 2009 and Marvel’s stock price went up by more than 25%.

According to the SEC, Scammell’s girlfriend, who worked on the Marvel deal as an extern with Disney, found out confidential information about the deal, including when it would be announced and that Disney would pay $50/Marvel share. The Commission, however, doesn’t believe that Scammell’s girlfriend ever intended to give him insider tips or that she knew what he was doing with the information. Although the couple would talk about the acquisition as a subject of her business school application, she did not give him specific details. He also allegedly obtained information from confidential documents that he read off her Blackberry and from conversations he overheard regarding Marvel.

Scammell bought Marvel call options at $45 and $50 strike prices even though the highest that Marvel had ever traded at was $41.74. The SEC says that the Marvel options that Scammell bought were scheduled to expire soon after the Disney deal was announced and that in many cases the purchase of options represented 100% of the market. Scammell used his brother’s money to buy most of the Marvel call options. He did not, however, tell him about the alleged insider trading activities. Scammell’s brother had given him authority over his finances before going with the US army to Iraq.

The SEC says that before making the trades, Scammell used his computer to search for the terms “material non-public information,” “insider trading”, and “Rule 10b-5.” The Commission claims that Scammell not only used the insider information to garner an “unfair and illegal” advantage over others in the markets but that he exploited his romantic relationship with his girlfriend. The SEC says that after dating her exclusively for two years, he owed her a fiduciary duty, which he breached. He also allegedly acted with Scienter when he made the trades while having knowledge of the material, nonpublic data. The SEC says that when questioned, Scammell was unable to provide a believable explanation for his Marvell call options purchases.

The SEC is accusing Scammell of violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Section 10(b)) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. It is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, a permanent injunction, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.

SEC CHARGES FORMER INVESTMENT FUND ASSOCIATE WITH INSIDER TRADING, SEC, August 11, 2011

Read the SEC Complaint (PDF)

SEC Sues 26-Year Old On Charges He Made $200,000 Insider Trading Off Ex-Girlfriend's Work Project, Business Insider, August 15, 2011



More Blog Posts:
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC to Pay $850K to Settle Securities Charges Over Alleged Failure to Prevent Inside Trading, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, July 21, 2011

“Poohster” Consultant Found Guilty of Insider Trading, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, June 23, 2011

Insider Trading: Former FrontPoint Partners Hedge Fund Manager Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, August 20, 2011

Continue reading "California Insider Trading Charges Filed by SEC Against Ex-Investment Fund Associate Accused of Making 3000% Profit on Marvel Call Options in Disney Acquisition" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Insider Trading , SEC Enforcement , Securities Fraud

August 16, 2011

Citigroup Global Markets Fined $500,000 by FINRA for Inadequate Supervision of Broker Accused of Bilking Sick and Elderly Investors

Two months after a federal grand jury indicted Tamara Lanz Moon for misappropriating more than $800,000 in clients’ money, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined Citigroup Global Markets $500,000 for failing to properly supervise her. Moon is charged with six counts of mail fraud. The acts of broker misconduct allegedly took place between 2001 and 2008, when the 43-year-old broker was employed by Citigroup Global Markets as a registered sales assistant with Series 7 and 63 licenses.

Court documents report that Moon targeted at least 22 Citigroup clients who were sick, elderly, or for some reason couldn’t properly monitor their accounts. Her alleged victims included an elderly client suffering from Parkinson’s disease. Moon also allegedly forged signatures, changed account documents, opened accounts with deceased clients’ social security numbers, created bogus letters of authorization, revised customer addresses, and made unauthorized trades. She was fired in 2008 after Citigroup finally discovered her alleged misconduct. FINRA would go on to permanently barred her from the industry. Moon, who was arrested by the FBI following recent indictment, is out on bail.

According to FINRA, Citigroup failed to investigate or detect a number of “red flags” that should have let the financial firm know that Moon was improperly handing client funds. The SRO is also accusing FINRA of failing to put into place reasonable controls and systems related to the supervisory review of client accounts, which allowed Moon to falsify records, and neglecting to identify suspicious activity related to disbursements and transfers in the accounts that she was using to misappropriate clients’ money.

FINRA says that Moon was able to use Citigroup’s “lax supervisory practices” to bilk the financial firm’s “most vulnerable” clients. The SRO says that Citigroup could have and should have stopped her.

Among the warning signs that Citigroup is accused of not responding to:
• Address discrepancies in exception reports regarding an elderly widow whom Moon bilked of almost $80,000. When Moon explained to Citigroup that the inaccuracy occurred because the client had moved to Arizona, Citigroup accepted the reason she provided, which allowed her to keep misappropriating client money.

• Even after Citigroup was told that one customer had died, Moon was still able to create an account in that person’s name and that dead client’s widow. She then transferred money from the deceased client’s bogus account to the widow’s fraudulent account, wrote checks from the widow’s account, and transferred several thousand dollars to her personal account.

• Even though Moon set up a fraudulent account in her dad’s name, transferred $150,000 of a customer’s account into the bogus account, and took $90,000 of that money that she moved into one of her accounts, Citigroup didn’t detect her misconduct. FINRA says that this because Citigroup’s review of customer account records was deficient.

By agreeing to settle, Citigroup is not denying or admitting to the securities charges.

FINRA Fines Citigroup $500,000 for Failing to Supervise Sales Assistant Who Misappropriated Customer Funds, FINRA, August 9, 2011

Citigroup Global Markets Fined $500,000 in FINRA Failure to Supervise Case, Forbes, August 10, 2011

Citigroup Aide Stole From Widows, Father, Finra Says, Bloomberg, August 25, 2009


More Blog Posts:
Citigroup Global Markets Sales Assistant Accused of Stealing from Clients is Banned by FINRA from the Securities Industry, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 4, 2009

Texas Securities Fraud: Insurance Agent Could Get 100 Years Behind Bars for Using Fraudulent Annuities to Bilk Elderly Seniors of Over $5M, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 9, 2011

Citigroup Ordered by FINRA to Pay $54.1M to Two Investors Over Municipal Bond Fund Losses, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, April 13, 2011

Federal Judge to Approve Citigroup’s $75M Securities Settlement with SEC Over Bank’s Subprime Mortgage Debt Reporting to Investors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, September 29, 2010

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Citigroup , FINRA , Financial Firms , Securities Fraud , Senior Investors

August 10, 2011

Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and Former Executive Faces SEC Charges Over Sale of CDOs to Five Wisconsin School Districts

The SEC is charging Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and its former Senior Vice President David W. Noack with securities fraud over the sale of unsuitable, high-risk complex investments to 5 Wisconsin school districts. Stifel and Noack allegedly misrepresented the risks involved in investing $200 million in synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and did not disclose certain material facts. The investments proved a “complete failure.”

The Five Wisconsin School Districts:
• Kimberly Area School District
• Kenosha Unified School District No. 1
• School District of Waukesha
• School District of Whitefish Bay
• West Allis-West Milwaukee School District

All five school districts are suing Stifel and Royal Bank of Canada in civil court. Robert Kantas, partner of Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP, is one of the attorneys representing the school districts in their civil case against Stifel and RBC. Attorneys for the school districts issued the following statement:

“We believe that Stifel, Royal Bank of Canada and the other defendants defrauded the five Wisconsin school districts, along with trusts set up to make these investments. In 2006, these defendants devised, solicited and sold $200 million 'synthetic collateralized debt obligations' (CDOs), which were both volatile and complex, to these districts and trusts. While represented as safe investments, these were in fact very high risk securities, which were wholly unsuitable for the districts and trusts. In an attempt to protect taxpayers and residents, the districts hired attorneys and other professionals to investigate the investments and the potential for fraud. Then, with a goal of seeking full recovery of the monies lost in this scheme, a lawsuit was filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court in 2008 to seek fully recovery of the losses and maintain and protect valuable credit ratings of these districts. To date, more than 3 million pages of documents have been obtained and examined by the attorneys for the districts. The districts also properly reported to the SEC the nature and extent of the wrongdoing uncovered. Over the past year, they have provided the SEC with volumes of documents and information to facilitate its investigation.”

In its complaint filed in federal court today, the SEC says that Stifel and Noack set up a proprietary program to assist the school districts in funding retiree benefits through the investments of notes linked to the performance of CDOs. The school districts invested $200 million with trusts they set up in 2006. $162.7 million was paid for with borrowed funds.

The SEC contends that Stifel and Noack, who both earned substantial fees even though the investments failed completely, took advantage of their relationships with the school districts and acted fraudulently when they sold financial products that were inappropriate for the latter. The brokerage firm and its executive also likely were aware that the school districts weren’t experienced or sophisticated enough to be able to evaluate the risks associated with investing in the CDOs. Both also likely knew that the school districts could not afford to suffer such catastrophic losses if their investments were to fail. Despite this, says the SEC, Noack and Stifel assured the school districts that for the investments to collapse there would have to be “15 Enrons.” They also allegedly failed to reveal certain material facts to the school districts, including that:

• The first transaction in the portfolio did poorly from the beginning.
• Within 36 days of closing, credit rating agencies had placed 10% of the portfolio on negative watch.
• There were CDO providers who said they wouldn’t participate in Stifel’s proprietary program because they were worried about the risks involved.

The SEC claims that Stifel and Noack violated the:

• Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Section (10b))
• The Securities Act of 1933 (Section 17(a))
• The Securities Act of 1934 (Section 15(c)(1)(A))

The Commission is seeking, permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, financial penalties, and prejudgment interest.

Related Web Resources:
SEC Charges Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and Executive with Fraud in Sale of Investments to Wisconsin School District, SEC.gov, August 10, 2011

SEC Sues Stifel Over Wisconsin School Losses Tied to $200 Million of CDOs, Bloomberg, August 10, 2011

Read the SEC Complaint (PDF)

School Lawsuit Facts


More Blog Posts:
Wisconsin School Districts Sue Royal Bank of Canada and Stifel Nicolaus and Co. in Lawsuit Over Credit Default Swaps, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 7, 2008

SEC Inquiring About Wisconsin School Districts Failed $200 Million CDO Investments Made Through Stifel Nicolaus and Royal Bank of Canada Subsidiaries, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, June 11, 2010

Continue reading "Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and Former Executive Faces SEC Charges Over Sale of CDOs to Five Wisconsin School Districts" »

Posted by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas LTD LLP | | Email This Post

Posted In: Collateral Debt Obligation , Financial Firms , SEC Enforcement , Securities Fraud , Stifel, Nicolaus, & Co. Inc.

Call for a Free Consultation
(800) 259-9010

Contact Us

The code above is for the protection of your information.

Browse

  • Topics
  • By Date
  • Search
Topics
By Date
Search

Recent Entries

Legal Blogs