Causes of action include fraud, negligent misrepresentation, aiding and abetting fraud, and fraudulent inducement. California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the Nature Conservancy are among the scores of plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs are accusing Wachovia of knowing about the fraud and financial problems at Le Nature’s but keeping this information from investors so that the beverage company would keep paying the firm substantial fees. They say the lack of disclosure also helped Wachovia’s high-yield debt business.

Also named in the lawsuit are BDO Seidman and Ernst & Young. The companies had worked for Le Nature’s as auditors on different occasions. The plaintiffs say that the “clean” audit reports aided in the fraud. BDO Seidman denies the accusation and vows to vigorously defend itself against the charges.

Wachovia claims that it too was the victim of fraud by the drink company. One Le Nature's accounting director that pled guilty to fraud acknowledged that the company had issued false information to Wachovia.

About 75 plaintiffs claim they suffered aggregate losses worth over $70 million. The plaintiffs are accusing Wachovia Securities of minimizing its own losses by purposely reducing its own exposure to Le Nature’s notes.

The complaint says that the drink company massively inflated its profits and revenue for years even though it was failing badly. Yet Wachovia market analysis gave Le Nature’s an “outperform” rating despite the fact that it was struggling to survive.

The stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents investor fraud victims in cities across the United States.

Related Web Resources:

Lawsuit alleges fraud in LeNature's dealings, Pittsburgh-Tribune Review, May 1, 2008

Former Le-Nature's employee pleads guilty in fraud scheme, Forbes.com, April 24, 2008

$78 billion in auction-rate securities—many of them involving municipal notes that come with high interest penalty rates—are expected to be redeemed. Investors with remaining issues, however, aren’t us lucky.

According to Saber Partners Chief Executive Joseph S. Fichera, one option is for investors to try and sell on the Restricted Securities Trading Network, which would allow them to exit while letting municipal issuers repurchase securities at a savings. He also says that issuers might also want to renegotiate contracts to get rid of payments for failed auctions and unsold securities.

Meanwhile, Wall Street continues to generate money from this ongoing debacle. Investment firms continue to tell municipal issuers to repurchase their securities at par, because to recommend that they redeem at discounts could cause the firms’ own customers to record losses—and lead to potential arbitration cases.

The investment banks also continue to generate fees for their services in running these auctions even though 70% of these weekly securities auctions are failing. Investment companies also earn banking fees when municipal issuers redeem their securities and/or unwind derivative contracts tied to the securities.

On April 28, U.S. Representatives Deborah Price (Ohio) and Spencer Bachus (Ala) asked SEC Chairman Christopher Cox to grant “temporary relief” from current regulations so that closed-end fund investors with auction-market preferred stock (AMPS) could be afforded some protection.

They say the move could inject much needed liquidity into the marketplace that would benefit both preferred and common shareholders. They also noted that several affected funds might be interested in issuing a new kind of preferred stock with a “put” option that could restore auction market functioning for these kinds of securities.

The stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents investors that have lost money because of the negligence, carelessness, or misconduct of investment banks, brokers, and other securities industry members.

Related Web Resources:

Securities investors say they were misled, Chron.com, April 30, 2008

Restricted Securities Trading Network

By settling, the SEC says that the former broker is not admitting to or denying the charges. As part of his agreement, Mondschein agreed to a bar preventing him from associating with any dealers or brokers for five years. He is also permanently enjoined from violating the 1934 Securities Exchange Act’s Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, as well as Regulation S-P. He must also pay a $45,000 penalty.

The SEC complaint has alleged that Mondschein illegally sold for profit the confidential data of over 500 clients, almost all of them senior citizens, to six insurance agents. Information included contact information and, sometimes, the dollar figure that an investor had spent on the last annuity. This sale allowed the insurance brokers to sell the investors more annuity products, even though the majority of them already had purchased equity-indexed or fixed annuities.

The insurers reportedly paid the stockbroker anywhere from $50 to $150 for the information. Mondschein also allegedly received customer commissions from the investors that employed his services to sell securities so they could buy the new annuities.

Mondschein allegedly created UNCI Inc. so that he could carry out his investment scam. He did not tell the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or WFG Investment that UNCI Inc. existed.

Elderly investor fraud is a problem that must be stopped. Our stockbroker fraud attorneys at Shepherd Smith and Edwards have helped many senior investor fraud victims recover their losses. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.

Related Web Resources:
SEC Makes Broker Pay for Selling Client Info, CCH Wall Street, April 29, 2008

Broker Allegedly Sold Customers' Personal and Confidential Information to Insurance Agents as Sales "Leads" for Annuity Products, SEC.gov, December 6, 2007

Fasciano has agreed to the entry of judgment that he violated the 1934 Securities Exchange Act’s Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.

The court also found Gann culpable under the act’s antifraud provisions and ordered him to disgorge $56,640.67 in commissions. The court also ordered a $50,000 civil penalty and granted the SEC’s request for injunctive relief.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Fasciano opened Southwest Securities accounts to engage in market trading for Haidar Capital Management and Capital Advisor ("HCM"). He then allegedly asked Gann, who did not have a license to trade mutual fund shares, to be his partner.

The two men allegedly received a “block notice” after attempting to place the first market timing trade for HCM. They received more block notices after making more trades.

They allegedly responded by adopting a new branch office number and using several broker numbers. Witnesses say that there is no legitimate reason to use multiple broker numbers and they often are an attempt to conceal an investor’s identity so that he or she can keep trading.

According to the court, Gann may have contacted the mutual funds prior to making any trades, but “he acted with scienter, that is, he had the intent to deceive or defraud the mutual funds in which he traded on behalf of HCM."

If you are a victim of investment fraud or broker misconduct, contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today for your free consultation with an experienced stockbroker fraud lawyer.

Related Web Resource:

Read the SEC Complaint

Findings included:

*Over 52% of respondents said they made an investment mistake because they did not understand or were confused about the investment.

*Over half of the participants surveyed say that they do not read financial information because they can’t understand it.

*Two-thirds of the survey participants say they would rate the financial services industry’s ability to explain investing and savings with a C, a D , or an F grade.

*Survey respondents said the two most common investment mistakes that they’ve made included waiting too long to invest and failing to invest.

*41% of the participants that they didn’t find financial services information to be very helpful.

AARP Chief Investment Officer Richard Hisey said the survey results showed a clear failure to communicate.

The stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents victims of investor fraud and broker misconduct. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.

Related Web Resources:

AARP Financial Inc. Survey Finds: When it Comes to Financial Jargon, Americans are Befuddled, PR Newswire, April 2008

AARP FInancial

An ARS Task Force, comprised of state securities regulators from Massachusetts, Illinois, Florida, Missouri, Georgia, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Texas, and Washington all working in their individual jurisdictions, is investigating these ARS-related complaints.

NASAA President Karen Tyler, also North Dakota's securities commissioner, says that regulators will seek the proper remedies to any violation. Tyler says that task force members are focused on determining whether any broker violations, including omission and misrepresentation, took place during the point of sale. She also stressed the securities regulators’ commitment to making sure that investors can access their funds.

In the wake of the subprime mortgage, many investors that were told that ARS were similar to money market accounts or making cash deposits now cannot touch their money because of ARS trade failures.

ARS Task Force head Bryan Lantagne says that many investors are have complained that they did not know that brokers had placed their money in auction-rate securities or, if they were aware that they had invested in ARS, they were not notified of the liquidity risks.

In New York, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has subpoenaed 18 securities firms and banks to determine how brokers market ARS to investors. The companies subpoenaed include UBS AG, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, Inc., JP Morgan Chase and Co., and Goldman Sachs Group.

Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents victims of investor fraud. Your first consultation with us is free.

Related Web Resources:

Credit Crisis Backlash as States Probe Auction-Rate Securities, IBTimes.com, April 18, 2008

New Trouble in Auction-Rate Securities, NY Times, February 15, 2008

In a letter addressed to SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, Frank noted that there had been an “unusually high level of short-selling activity” in Bear Stearns stock right before the company fell apart. He also noted that similar trading in the stocks of other large investment banks has occurred.

Frank cited concerns that some of this trading may be orchestrated by market participants that are trying to bring the share prices down. Frank is calling on the SEC to investigate trading activity of stocks in all the big investment banks.

Other companies that have been heavily shorted recently include Citigroup, Washington Mutual, Wachovia, Wells Fargo, CIT Group, and Countrywide.

Bear Stearns executives say that short-sellers are part of the reason the firm collapsed. They also blame circulated false rumors as a reason that customers abandoned the investment bank, which resulted in its liquidity crisis.

Short-sellers borrow shares and sell them in the hopes that the stock will fall. They can then purchase the shares at a lower price, return them to the lender, and keep the difference. To increase the speed of short-selling, traders are allowed to find someone who will say they have the shares to lend them out. This allows traders to lie and say they have the trade.

A few weeks ago, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued a warning to broker-dealers and others under its supervision, stating that it would not tolerate the intentional spreading of false rumors or the “engaging in collusive activity to impact the financial condition of an issuer.”

Our stockbroker fraud lawyers at Shepherd Smith and Edwards represent clients throughout the United States that are the victims of investor fraud. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today and ask for your free consultation.

Related Web Resources:

Get Shorty, Forbes.com, April 7, 2008

Frank Letter to Cox Short Sales of Bear Stearns and Other Investment Bank Stock, House Committee on Financial Services, April 4, 2008

This case is part of a broader criminal probe involving 13 people that have pled guilty to a massive insider trading scheme involving data they acquired from Wall Street brokerage companies. Defendants included ex-employees from Morgan Stanley, UBS AG, Bear Stearns Co, and Bank of America Corp.

The Justice Department says that one of the defendants, former UBS Securities executive Mitchel Guttenburg, had sold nonpublic data prepared by UBS stock analysts to another defendant, trader David Tavdy.

Tavdy and David Glass, also a defendant, then used an Assent account to execute trades and earn illegal profits. Data regarding UBS analysts’ upgrades and downgrades were used for hundreds of transactions that netted over $17.5 million.

Childs found out about their illegal activities and agreed to receive $100,000 in exchange for not reporting them. He had received just $30,000 before his arrest.

Childs’s sentencing will take place in July. As part of his plea agreement, he will likely face up to two years in prison and be ordered to give up the $30,000.

If you believe that you have been the victim of securities fraud, contact the stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards for your free consultation to discuss your investor fraud case.

Related Web Resources:

Broker pleads guilty in U.S. trading case, Washington Post, April 10, 2008

A 13th Plea in Insider Case, Wall Street Journal, April 10, 2008

Related Web Resources:

Trading on Tips About UBS Research Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades and About Morgan Stanley Client Merger Deals Netted Defendants More than $8 million, New York.FBI.gov, March 1, 2007

Assent LLC

The investor plaintiffs claim that the defendants misled them when they provided false statements about the funds’ lack of diversification and the degree to which the funds were exposed to subprime-backed securities. The plaintiffs say that the funds—marketed as a safe alternative to money market funds—actually had more than half of its fund assets invested in the mortgage industry.

The funds are down significantly. Through March 26, The Schwab YieldPlus Investor Fund (SWYPX) has fallen 17% , while the Schwab California Tax-Free YieldPlus Fund (SWYCX) has dropped by 9% . Investors say that the defendants were in violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 when they misrepresented the funds to investors, marketing them with the goal of looking for high current income coupled with minimum share price changes.

Anxious investors left the Schwab YieldPlus Investor Fund when it dropped by about 3.6% in 2007. Fund assets reportedly fell from $13.5 billion in June 2007 to $2.5 billion last month. Fund managers must now sell bonds at depressed rates.

The Schwab California Tax-Free YieldPlus Fund (SWYCX)’s assets are down from $1.1 billion in mid-2007 to under $600 million this March. The source of the significant drop is attributed to its investments in variable-rate bonds connected to the London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) index, which has fallen as liquidity has disappeared.

The investor fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents investor clients that have lost money because investment advisers or stockbrokers engaged in misrepresentation, omissions, unsuitability, overconcentration, churning, failure to supervise, failure to execute trades, breach of promise/contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, margin account abuse, registration violations, or unauthorized trading. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards for your free consultation to discuss your case.

Related Web Resource:

Schwab YieldPlus Fund

The signatures were allegedly forged to make it seem that certain financial plans had been delivered when in fact they had not been sent. The New Hampshire regulators say that the advisers did this to make it appear is if their sales numbers were higher than their actual figures.

Out of the settlement, $333,948 will reimburse investors and $250,000 will cover legal and investigation expenses.

New Hampshire says that Ameriprise failed to report the forgeries that took place from the company’s Portsmouth office. Advisers allegedly used the code phrase that they were ‘taking a 10-minute trip to Kennebunkport' to indicate that they were going to forge papers.

By agreeing to settle, Ameriprise is not admitting to or denying the allegations. The company has disciplined three of the six advisers and let go of two others. The sixth adviser resigned during the probe.

Ameriprise says that it has put new preventive procedures in place, such as requiring original client signatures and taking aggressive action if violations occur again.

The investment fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards is dedicated to helping investor fraud victims across the US recover their losses. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today and ask for your free consultation.

Related Web Resources:

Ameriprise settles New Hampshire forgery case, Reuters, April 9, 2008

Ameriprise Settles Forgery Case, The Wall Street Journal, April 10, 2008

Ameriprise Financial Inc.

New Hampshire Securities Regulation

FINRA says that 9 of the 16 representatives were supervisors that allowed or directed subordinates to take State Farm's 'Firm Element' proficiency test for them. One supervisor told a subordinate to take the test for other reps. The other six registered representatives that settled were the ones that took the test for others.

The SRO says State Farm did not know about the misconduct and self-reported after it discovered that there were irregularities taking place in one of its regions. State Farm began investigating the incidents. It then expanded its probe nationally and reported its findings to FINRA.

The Firm Element portion of the mandatory two-part test, which is administered by FINRA, other SROs, and the Securities Industry/Regulatory Council on Continuing Education, requires that firms give registered employees who deal with clients, and their supervisors, the proper training that covers the areas of new products, risk disclosure, sales practices, and new regulatory requirements and concerns.

State Farm’s 2005 Firm Element test, according to FINRA, requires each test-taker to log onto an "internal, computer-based system" by inputting their user ID and password. The subordinates that engaged in the alleged misconduct are accused of using their supervisors’ user names and passwords to take the test for them.

By admitting to the charges and settling them, the respondents are not admitting to or denying the allegations.

The investment fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents investors that have lost money because of the negligence or misconduct of a securities industry member. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.

Related Web Resources:

FINRA Fines, Suspends 16 State Farm Representatives for Test-Taking Irregularities in the Firm’s Continuing Education Program, Business Wire, March 6, 2008

FINRA and the Securities Industry Continuing Education Program, FINRA

State Farm Companies

Hawes is the owner and president of Financial Management Advisory Services (FMAS) and Financial Management Services (FMS) Inc. He is also a registered investment adviser. He became an authorized representative for Fidelity Investment Advisors Group in 1997.

According to the court, Hawes defrauded his investment adviser clients. Rather than fulfill the agreements he made to buy annuities for them, he would either keep the money or buy annuities but later liquidate them for his personal use.

Hawes covered up his theft by generating false statements, making it appear as if the accounts contained larger balances, and submitting these reports to clients.

In 1998, Hawes convinced a number of clients to transfer their assets into products that were offered by Fidelity. From 1998 to until 2002, clients regularly received account statements from Fidelity and Hawes. The statements that Hawes provided through FMAS matched the account balances on statements provided by Fidelity.

In 2002, however, Hawes reportedly went into his clients’ accounts without their consent and changed the addresses to which Fidelity was supposed mail their account statements—in many instances, he provided his own office address.

He then told clients that Fidelity was not issuing paper account statements anymore and that his company, FMAS, would be responsible for generating these statements for them.

Hawes then started transferring client funds into his own account. He also transferred funds from one client to another so the thefts would go undetected. FMAS continued to issue account statements that falsely overstated the value of clients’ Fidelity accounts.

In 2003, Hawes’s mother discovered that he had been stealing money from her and her husband, who had just died. She threatened to report him unless he paid her back. He took $125,000 from other clients to repay her.

Hawes’s fraud scheme was discovered later that year. He pleaded guilty two counts of mail fraud in 2004 and was sentenced to 78 months in prison and a 3-year supervised release. He was ordered to pay invest clients $2,276,565.31 in restitution.

Hawes appealed his sentence on the grounds that the district court made a mistake when it applied a two-level identity theft enhancement to his base level offense because he had changed his clients' addresses. On March 27, the appeals court agreed that Hawes’s conduct did not merit this enhancement.

Shepherd Smith and Edwards represents victims of investor fraud in arbitration and litigation.

Related Web Resources:

Final Passage of H.R. 1731, the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act, SSA.gov, June 29, 2004

Read the SEC Complaint

In a letter from the AFP, CEO Jim Kaitz urged Cox to use the authority that Congress granted the SEC with the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, which gives the SEC permission to hold the agencies accountable for providing timely and accurate ratings.

SEC Director of Trading and Markets Erik Sirri has said, however, that although the SEC can hold credit rating systems accountable for their ratings, it does not have the authority to interfere with the way that agencies assign ratings, which is a key issue that is impacting the current subprime mortgage market crisis.

The AFP, made of 16,000 financial professionals, wants the SEC to tackle the abusive and unfair practices that negatively affect the legitimacy of the credit rating system.

Sirri says the SEC is developing rules that could address the prohibition or disclosure of conflicts of interests at the agencies and the need to have different ratings for structured financial products and corporate securities. The SEC is also thinking about removing references to credit rating agencies from its own rules (there are more than 30 references) so market participants won’t rely on the agencies as much.

SEC based on the SEC’s examination of the nine SEC-registered credit-rating agencies or nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs).

The securities fraud lawyers at Shepherd Smith and Edwards have more than a century of combined experience in securities law and the securities industry. We have helped thousands of victims of investor fraud recoup their losses.

Related Web Resources:

AFP Urges SEC to Fully Exercise Oversight Authority Over Credit Rating Agencies, PRNewswire, March 24, 2008

List of Credit Ratings Agencies, DefaultRisk.com

Association for Financial Professionals

The two defendants, Marcos Macchione and Rodrigo Molina, face charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and participating in illegal financial transactions. The two men reside in Florida and are being charged in connection with their involvement with the US part of the securities scam. A Florida jury handed out the indictment in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Doron Mukamal, the alleged leader of the telemarketing securities scam, was also arrested. He lives in Brazil, as do his 17 partners, employees, associates, and money launderers that were also arrested.

Asian and European investors were the primary victims of the scam. Mukamal and his team offered them the opportunity to buy nearly worthless stocks in U.S. micro-cap companies for much more than the penny stocks’ actual value.

The investors were told to pay an advance fee to cover escrow costs, taxes, and other services. This fee is not normally required for transactions that are legal.

Once the advance fee was received, the bogus broker-dealer would disappear. When investors contacted these fictitious brokers to find out what happened to their money, they were notified that warrants (that did not actually exist) or the rights to buy more shares held by the victims had been found. The bogus brokers would then try to persuade their targets to shell out even more money.

Mukamal and his team constructed Web sites that made it appear as if they were legitimate securities brokers. They also made up names of fictitious broker dealers, stole the identities of real U.S. brokers, fabricated false government entities that could confirm their broker-dealer’s legitimacy, and used U.S. phone numbers so that investors would think that the broker-dealers were located in the United States.

Our stockbroker fraud lawyers at Shepherd Smith and Edwards have helped thousands of investors recover their financial losses. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards to schedule your free consultation.

Related Web Resources:

U.S., Brazilian Law Enforcement Dismantle $50 Million Securities Fraud Organization, PRNewswire.com, March 20, 2008

What Is Penny Stock Fraud?

Yet, even FINRA is critical of its members for mishandling auction rate securities (ARS). For example, in a press release, FINRA acknowledges that “Investors who purchase ARS are typically seeking a cash-like investment that pays a higher yield than money market mutual funds or certificates of deposit.” This confirms, despite objections by firms, that investors believed they were getting liquid instruments, not 20 to 30 year obligations or even “no maturity” preferred shares

"If you need your money in a hurry, loss of liquidity is a financial hardship," states John Gannon, FINRA's Senior Vice President for Investor Education. "We want investors who have been affected by the recent auction failures to know what options are available to them."

FINRA then mentions alternatives for “ARS investors who cannot liquidate their holdings because of failed auctions,” including (1) continue to hold; (2) sell in the secondary market; (3) borrow on margin; and, (4) liquidate other investments.

After stating that most ARS investors sought liquidity, it is strange that FINRA would recommend holding the securities. Importantly, recommending the holding of such securities to one who needs liquidity, violates FINRA’s own Rules of Fair Practice regarding unsuitability! While investors can not sell until there is a market, liquidation when possible may indeed be the only option for victims.

Selling in the secondary market, when possible, is the second option and should strongly be considered by ARS holders! The law holds that victims can recover losses from those who misrepresent securities to them, but the law also says victims must “mitigate” losses as soon as possible. As with any other investment, if you would not buy an investment at a price, you should not hold it for the same reason. Also, When others think the market can only get better with time it is usually best to run for the hills!

FINRA is not enthusiastic about “borrowing on margin,” stating that “[s]ome firms are offering to lend customers money to help them meet their cash flow needs. Be aware that the interest rate charged on these loans may exceed the yield you're getting on the underlying security. Also, borrowing against a tax-exempt security may cause you to lose the ability to deduct some or all of the margin loan interest from your taxes.”

We also note that margining illiquid and troubled securities is in itself quite dangerous, and that firms are charging lucrative interest rates to those who are victims of that firm’s own bad acts concerning ARS securities.

FINRA adds: “You might also consider selling other securities in your portfolio. When weighing this option, be sure to consider factors such as the total transaction costs you would incur, whether the sale would trigger adverse tax consequences and how the liquidation would impact the balance of your portfolio.” FINRA fails to mention that selling other securities at depressed prices can create even greater damages than in the ARS which are the source of the problem.

Moreover, FINRA fails to mention that anyone with legal problems should contact an attorney, before making statements to brokerage firms or regulators who share such information with brokerage firms. Ever heard this? “You have a right to an attorney” and “anything you say can and will he held against you in a court of law.” Did you wonder why the person then keeps talking? Sending a complaint to a firm or a regulator without an attorney is - well - exactly the same thing!

The securities law firm of Shepherd, Smith, Edwards and Kantas has for decades handled claims by investors worldwide against brokerage and other financial firms. We are currently working on claims for both institutional and individual investors whose funds are now locked into ARS securities. Contact us to arrange a free, no obligation consultation with one of our attorneys regarding your situation or if you wish to receive our weekly newsletter regarding ARS securities.

LINK TO ARTICLE ON ARS SECURITIES: (Our firm does not endorse the opinions or statements of of the article's author.)

ARC and ARP Securities: How Wall Street Brokerage Firms May Have Defrauded Their Clients Out of Billions Overnight Trading, February 24, 2008 (Author’s name withheld by request)