January 17, 2008

SMH Capital and Two of Its Brokers to Settle FINRA Charges Over Oversight Failures

SMH Capital has agreed to pay $450,000 in fines to settle charges by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over the broker dealer’s failure to have supervisory procedures and systems in place to handle its prime brokerage and soft dollar services to hedge funds. The oversight led to a hedge fund manager receiving improper payments in soft dollars worth $325,000.

FINRA says other failures by SMH included producing and giving out hedge fund sales materials that failed to properly “disclose material investment risks to potential hedge fund investors.” SRO is accusing SMH of engaging in an “improper compensation arrangement” with two brokers who supervised hedge funds.

The two SMH brokers, Michael Rosen and Jack Seibal, have agreed to $100,000 fines and a 20-day suspension. SRO says that agreements prohibited the two men from receiving a share of any commission that SMH earned for fund trades. A third unregistered SMH employee agreed to a 10-day suspension and a $15,000 penalty.

FINRA says that SMH had relationships with over 15 hedge funds. Hedge fund managers were offered “a platform of services,” including marketing support, office space, and introductory capital. The services were paid for via commissions on trades that were directed to SMH.

Due to what FINRA calls SMH’s failure to have policies and procedures to regulate soft dollars, one hedge fund manager received $325,000.

SMH issued the payment after the manager submitted an invoice asking for two checks. $75,000 was to be issued to someone else for consulting services and the second check, a little under $250,000, was to be issued to the manager as a reimbursement for research costs. A description of the consulting services was not provided with the invoice.

FINRA says the invoice should not have been paid and that SMH would have determined this also if they had looked into the matter.

Investors who have lost money because of the misconduct of a broker or broker-dealer have legal rights and are entitled to get their money back. Retaining a stockbroker fraud attorney to represent you can offer you the best chances for success. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.


Related Web Resources:

SMH Capital Fined $450,000 for Procedural Failures Regarding Soft Dollar Payments, Reuters, January 9, 2008

SMH Capital

FINRA

February 27, 2007

Former Prudential and E.F. Hutton Exec. Weighing Problems at Current Firm.

Apparently unscathed by scandals at his former firms, 67 year old George Ball serves as Chairman of Sanders Morris Harris Group, Inc., a Houston based investment bank and wealth management firm.

Ball served as the No. 2 executive at E.F. Hutton & Co. Inc. from 1980 to 1982. Three years after he left, the now-defunct New York firm pleaded guilty to 2,000 counts of mail and wire fraud in a check-kiting scheme that occurred during Ball's tenure.

Ball left Hutton to become chairman of Prudential Bache Securities. That firm thereafter became involved with what some have called “the biggest swindle in Wall Street History.” Regulators charged the company with defrauding hundreds of thousands of customers by misstating risks involved in investment partnerships. Prudential paid restitution and penalties totaling $2 billion - the costliest settlement ever for a brokerage firm - and was forced to resolve thousands of civil claims by investors for its role in these investments.

Nevertheless, Ball soon resurfaced as the chairman of Sanders Morris. Although that firm has struggled and is one of few U.S. brokerage firms where profits and its stock price fell last year, it has grown to more than 500 employees, including advisors and investment bankers.

In an industry where reputation is not necessarily an impediment, Mr. Ball has survived. “Ball was never tagged personally with any of the problems that befell Hutton or Prudential, and he has a lot of friends, so he’s still plenty viable in the business,” said Richard Lipstein, a principal of a New York based executive recruiting firm.

While Ball insists that others are responsible for the events which sunk his former firms, Sanders Morris has also found itself in trouble with regulators. Last year, the NASD warned that it plans to discipline the firm for a variety of violations, including improper commission payments to a hedge fund manager. A spokesman described the regulatory matter as “routine” - which is apparently true.

Sanders Morris also faces exposure to claims by investors unhappy with the performance of a 2005 private placement for a company at which two Sanders Morris managing directors served as directors. Sanders Morris has warned that the costs of defending itself in these regulatory and civil matters could be significant.