February 28, 2008

Merrill Lynch, Prudential Securities, Pruco and UBS Must pay $2.4 Million in Fines for Mutual Fund Abuses

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that five major brokerage firms have agreed to pay fines totaling $2.4 million for supervision violations and improper mutual fund sales to thousands of investors. These firms must take remedial steps to prevent such actions in the future and pay amounts estimated to exceed $25 million to their clients because of such practices.

According to FINRA, the violations include sales by these firms of load securities, meaning clients were required to pay commissions, when these investors were eligible to make fund exchanges without paying commissions. FINRA’s press release states that “Class B and Class C mutual fund shares and failure to have supervisory systems designed to provide all eligible investors with the opportunity to purchase Class A mutual fund shares at net asset value (NAV) through NAV transfer programs.”

Prudential Securities must pay an $800,000 fine, UBS Financial Services, Inc. was fined $750,000 and Pruco Securities was hit for $100,000 for improper sales of Class B and Class C mutual fund shares. These firms also agreed to remediation plans that will address over 27,000 fund transactions in the accounts of 5,300 households. Merrill Lynch, Prudential Securities, UBS and Wells Fargo must take steps regarding customers who qualified for but did not receive the benefit of NAV transfer programs. It is estimated that total remediation to fhese firms' customers will exceed $25 million.

FINRA also fined Prudential Securities, UBS, and Merrill Lynch $250,000 each for failure to reasonable supervise and offer opportunities for investors to obtain sales charge waivers through NAV transfer programs. As a result of inadequate supervisory systems FINRA found that customers of Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo, UBS and Prudential Securities eligible for the NAV programs incurred front-end sales loads or purchased other share classes that unnecessarily subjected them to higher fees and sales charges.

FINRA found that Wells Fargo Investments failed to have reasonable supervisory systems and procedures relating to NAV transfer programs but did not impose a fine because the firm made changes before FINRA's inquiry into the practices. FINRA said the firm had initiated a review of its mutual fund sales and acted promptly and in good faith to correct its system and procedures and had reimbursed its customers over $612,000.

"Firms have an obligation to consider all relevant factors when recommending mutual fund investments, to ensure that they recommend the share class that is most advantageous to the customer," said Susan L. Merrill, Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement at FINRA. "The supervisory problems here led not only to the sales of inappropriate mutual fund share classes, but to the failure to identify special sales charge waiver programs on mutual fund purchases. We are pleased that through these settlements, millions of dollars will be returned to customers."

The securities law firm of Shepherd, Smith, Edwards and Kantas has represented thousands of institutional and individual investors nationwide with substantial claims for losses caused by wrongdoing of stockbrokers and their firms. Contact us today if you, your firm or someone you know could be the victim to arrange a free, confidential conference with one of our securities attorneys.

Bookmark: Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Google.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at del.icio.us Digg Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Digg.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Spurl.net Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Simpy.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at NewsVine Blink this Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at blinklist.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Furl.net Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at reddit.com Fark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Fark.com Bookmark Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Prudential%20Securities%2C%20Pruco%20and%20UBS%20Must%20pay%20%242.4%20Million%20in%20Fines%20for%20Mutual%20Fund%20Abuses at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 27, 2008

FINRA Says Ex-Morgan Stanley Stockbroker Misappropriated Nearly $400,000 From 97-Year-Old Widow

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority is charging stockbroker John Mullins with misappropriating nearly $400,000 from an elderly widow and her charitable foundation. Esther Weil, a 97-year-old widow, died earlier this month. She was living in a nursing home. Mullins was her stockbroker for over 20 years.

Mullins allegedly tried to conceal his status with his elderly client’s charitable foundation. John and his wife Kathleen were the trustees of Weil’s nonprofit foundation—a relationship that is prohibited by Morgan Stanley’s firm policies. Morgan Stanley employed the Mullins from 2002-2006. The company fired them after it was discovered that they were violating company policies.

John is accused of allegedly misappropriating funds from his employer for improper expenses, making misstatements on his firm’s yearly compliance questionnaires and Form U4, and accepting an unauthorized $100,000 loan from a client.

Mullins’ wife Kathleen also accepted a loan from the elderly woman and made misstatements on Form U4 and compliance questionnaires. The couple has been charged with failure to adhere to high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.

According to New Jersey Regulators, John Mullins converted $375,000 of Weil’s assets for his personal use when she became seriously ill in 2006. He also allegedly withdrew $14,000 from her Morgan Stanley account.

John also allegedly used Esther’s debit card to buy a $3,700 50-inch plasma television, bought $11,000 in Four Seasons Hotel and Resort Gift Certificates, and spent $4,000 to pay for a London vacation. He also may have charged the charitable foundation thousands of dollars for personal expenses.

The New Jersey Securities Bureau has charged the couple them with alleged misconduct. They are barred from working in New Jersey’s securities industry.

Shepherd Smith and Edwards has helped many stockbroker fraud victims throughout the U.S. recover their losses caused by the misconduct of brokers or advisers. One of our stockbroker fraud lawyers can speak with you today.


Related Web Resources:

Read the FINRA complaint, FINRA (PDF)

Margate couple sanctioned by state, Press of Atlantic City.com, February 15, 2008

Investors' Watchdog

Bookmark: Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Google.com Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at del.icio.us Digg FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Digg.com Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Spurl.net Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Simpy.com Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at NewsVine Blink this FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at blinklist.com Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Furl.net Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at reddit.com Fark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Fark.com Bookmark FINRA%20Says%20Ex-Morgan%20Stanley%20Stockbroker%20Misappropriated%20Nearly%20%24400%2C000%20From%2097-Year-Old%20Widow at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 26, 2008

Questar Executive Fired For Failure to Disclose Private Securities Transactions

Questar Capital Corp. has fired Jason Kavanaugh, its senior vice president of mergers and acquisitions, because he failed to disclose outside business activities and private securities transactions.

Kavanaugh recently came under fire when it was discovered that he paid E-M Management Co. LLC $57,000 for fake, unregistered securities. Kavanaugh also set up JASTAR, LLC, which acted as the official subscriber to the deals.

E-M Management Co. LLC, which is owned by Edward May. The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged May with masterminding an investment scam involving fake Las Vegas casino and resort telecommunications contracts. Some 1200 investors became victims of May’s $250 million scam.

Brokerage executives and representatives must disclose all external business deals.

Questar Capital is a unit of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. The combined company has over 1,000 affiliated advisers and representatives.

Our stockbroker law firm represents victims of investor fraud. Over the years, our investment fraud lawyers have helped thousands of investors recoup their losses. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.


Related Web Resources:

Questar exec fired for disclosure failure, InvestmentNews, February 22, 2008

SEC charges Edward May, E-M Management with fraud, Reuters.com, November 20, 2008

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America

Bookmark: Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Google.com Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at del.icio.us Digg Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Digg.com Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Spurl.net Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Simpy.com Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at NewsVine Blink this Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at blinklist.com Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Furl.net Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at reddit.com Fark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Fark.com Bookmark Questar%20Executive%20Fired%20For%20Failure%20to%20Disclose%20Private%20Securities%20Transactions%20 at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 25, 2008

How Wall Street Firms Convinced Investors to Put Billions into ARS and ARP Securities Just Before the Auctions “Failed”

An SSE Exclusive: Provided below is a link to a comprehensive expose explaining how Wall Street firms and banks may have convinced investors it was safe to place over $300 billion into “auction rate securities” by promising that these were safe and liquid investments.

During the week of February 11, 2008 the $330 billion market for “Auction Rate Securities” market virtually collapsed overnight as the liquidity of many of these investments disappeared and their safety was reportedly in jeopardy. What had been described to many as safe AAA credits, comparable to money market funds, were instead exposed in a nightmare for investors.

The article states that the result was “mass confusion” which caused by one of the most “convoluted structures ever devised by Wall Street.” The writer, who demonstrates special insight into the situation but desires to remain anonymous, laments that since the problem emerged “[e]veryone has a piece of the puzzle but no one to date put it together in one document.” The article is a MUST READ for all those seeking to understand the nature of this problem, including investors, law enforcement, regulators, attorneys and journalists.

Beginning with a description of the “Time value of Money Concept,” the article then provides a primer titled the “Introduction of the ARS Market,” followed by another describing “Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARPS),” which are described as “not market based” and which will likely lead to a far worse problem than other ARS securities.

The author alleges widespread deception and non-disclosure by individuals marketing these securities, many who were reportedly repeating what they had been told to say to their clients. “Wall Street houses were making so much money from this process, they were determined to find a way to write as much business as long as possible,” states the author, who describes how such firms kept perpetuating the ruse even after it was evident problems were eminent and were “artificially propping up these markets” until a tsunami of “failed” auctions struck last week.

The securities law firm of Shepherd Smith & Edwards, LLP does not endorse any opinions or allegations of the author of the article but beleives the information and opinions stated therein can be helpful to those seeking to understand the nature of this debacle and its scandalous implications for Wall Street.

LINK TO STORY:

ARC and ARP Securities: How Wall Street Brokerage Firms May Have Defrauded Their Clients Out of Billions Overnight Trading, February 24, 2008 (Author’s name withheld by request)

Bookmark: Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Google.com Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at del.icio.us Digg How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Digg.com Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Spurl.net Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Simpy.com Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at NewsVine Blink this How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at blinklist.com Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Furl.net Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at reddit.com Fark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Fark.com Bookmark How%20Wall%20Street%20Firms%20Convinced%20Investors%20to%20Put%20Billions%20into%20ARS%20and%20ARP%20Securities%20Just%20Before%20the%20Auctions%20%E2%80%9CFailed%E2%80%9D%20 at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 24, 2008

Ex-Credit Suisse Investment Banker Appeals Insider Trading Charges Conviction

Former Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC investment banker Hafiz Naseem says he will appeal his conviction for insider trading charges, which include 1 count of conspiracy and 28 counts of securities fraud involving stolen nonpublic data allegedly used for insider trading that generated at least $7.5 million. He faces a maximum 5-year prison sentence and fines two times the gross loss or gain of the violation.

The Justice Department says that the ex-Credit Suisse Securities investment banker told Ajaz Rahim, a Pakistan resident and the former head of Faysal Bank, about nine upcoming merger and acquisition deals from April 2006 to February 2007 including:

- Apollo Management LP’s Jacuzzi Brands acquisition
- NorthWestern Corp.’s acquisition by Babcock & Brown Infrastructure
- Veritas DGC Inc.’s acquisition by Compagnie Generale de Geophysique SA
- The merger between Energy Partners Ltd. and Stone Energy Corp.
- The TXU buyout

Rahim then used a Bahrain-based brokerage account to purchase stocks in the deals’ target companies. Although Naseem was not involved in working on any of the acquisition deals, he allegedly poured through internal databases and papers on his coworkers’ desks for confidential data that he passed on to Rahim.

The jury handed out the conviction on February 4 during his second trial. Naseem’s first trial ended in December because two jury members did not follow instructions provided by the court.

If you are an investor who has lost money because of the misconduct of an investment adviser or another member of the securities industry, one of our stockbroker fraud attorneys may be able to assist you. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.

Related Web Resources:

Ex-Credit Suisse Banker Naseem Convicted Of Insider Trading, Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2008

Banker Convicted on NY Insider Trading, CNN, February 4, 2008

Bookmark: Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Google.com Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at del.icio.us Digg Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Digg.com Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Spurl.net Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Simpy.com Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at NewsVine Blink this Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at blinklist.com Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Furl.net Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at reddit.com Fark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Fark.com Bookmark Ex-Credit%20Suisse%20Investment%20Banker%20Appeals%20Insider%20Trading%20Charges%20Conviction at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 22, 2008

SEC Involved in 36 Subprime Mortgage Industry Probes

The Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting three dozen open investigations into misconduct in the subprime mortgage industry. The probe is taking a look at possible misconduct involving:

• The origination process
• Insider trading
• Securitization and sales of mortgage-backed securities

According to SEC Division of Enforcement Associate Director Cheryl Scarboro, the SEC wants to know who may have been involved, who knew about any misconduct, and who acted inappropriately. Scarboro also directs the SEC Subprime Working Group, which coordinates these probes with other SEC divisions.

In SEC v. Doral Financial Corp., Doral settled claims that it overstated income on nonconforming loans for $25 million. The primary issues pertaining to this case included valuation of the future income stream, valuation of interest-only STRP’s, and applying a flat rate to value investments.

These issues are of major significance in pending cases involving the subprime mortgage industry. Other issues of focus in the SEC investigations include ownership transfer and booking the gain on sale.

The SEC has met with the companies it is investigating is helping to streamline the process.

In a recent TIME.com article, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc. Bose George estimated potential losses from the subprime mortgage crisis at around $250 billion. Columbia University professor Charles Calomiris estimates the losses at over $300 billion but under $400 billion. $1 trillion outstanding subprime mortgages currently exist.

Please contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards to discuss your case. We have helped thousands of investors recoup their losses.

Related Web Resources:

How Bad Will the Mortgage Crisis Get?, TIME.com, February 19, 2008

SEC probing three dozen subprime cases, Reuters, December 21, 2007

Why a U.S. Subprime Mortgage Crisis Is Felt Around the World, New York Times, August 21, 2007

Bookmark: Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Google.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at del.icio.us Digg SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Digg.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Spurl.net Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Simpy.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at NewsVine Blink this SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at blinklist.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Furl.net Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at reddit.com Fark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Fark.com Bookmark SEC%20Involved%20in%2036%20Subprime%20Mortgage%20Industry%20Probes at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 21, 2008

FINRA, SEC, and NASAA Announce New Initiative for Protecting Senior Investors

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) have announced a new group initiative to protect senior investors from becoming the victims of investment scams.

SEC, NASAA, and FINRA will work with investment advisers and broker-dealer companies to identify effective compliance and supervisory practices involving senior investors. Areas of exploration will include:

• Opening accounts
• Training company employees
• Marketing practices
• Advertising practices
• Review of products and accounts
• Fulfilling the evolving needs of aging investors
• Regularly reviewing products

Discoveries will be published so that all firms can learn how to implement the most effective and cutting edge practices to better serve senior investors and combat senior investment fraud.

These latest steps are part of a broader initiative, started by SEC, FINRA (previously NYSE and NASD), and NASAA in 2006 to protect elderly investors from fraud. Efforts have included enforcing securities laws, targeted exams, and actively educating elderly investors.

Since 2006, there have been a number of enforcement actions brought against firms and their employees who have taken advantage of senior investors. Our stockbroker fraud law firm is committed to helping elderly investors recoup their losses. We have helped thousands of fraud victims recover their money.

Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today.

Related Web Resources:

SEC, NASAA and FINRA Announce New Steps to Help Protect Senior Investors, February 8, 2008

Protecting Senior Investors: Report of Examinations of Securities Firms Providing "Free Lunch" Sales Seminars, SEC.gov (PDF)

Bookmark: Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Google.com Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at del.icio.us Digg FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Digg.com Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Spurl.net Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Simpy.com Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at NewsVine Blink this FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at blinklist.com Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Furl.net Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at reddit.com Fark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Fark.com Bookmark FINRA%2C%20SEC%2C%20and%20NASAA%20Announce%20New%20Initiative%20for%20Protecting%20Senior%20Investors at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 20, 2008

Detroit Accounting Firm Named in Lawsuit Involving Alleged Ponzi Scheme

The accounting firm of Doeren Mayhew & Company was named in a lawsuit filed in Oakland County, Michigan, in connection with a highly publicized multi-million dollar alleged ponzi scheme using partnerships, many purported to earn revenues from telephone usage in Las Vegas hotels. The central figure reported as the mastermind of such investments is Ed May who, along with other individuals and firms, is the subject of several investigations including by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of investors jointly by three law firms: Sheldon Miller & Associates, a premier Detroit area litigation firm, the Poppe Law Firm, which has extensive experience in accounting malpractice claims, and Shepherd Smith & Edwards, LLP, a securities law firm which handles claims for investors nationwide.

The suit states allegations regarding Doeren Mayhew, including that the accounting firm was listed as the accounting firm of record for various partnership investments and that the firm and that some of its agents and directors were involved with the ongoing business affairs of the partnerships and/or engaged into direct and indirect communications with investors which misled them regarding these investments.

The law firm of Shepherd, Smith & Edwards represents a number of individuals and other investors with large losses, many in their retirement accounts, sustained by investments into these partnerships. This law firm has also filed claims for misrepresentation and unsuitability in securities arbitration against a former stockbroker who sold these and other investments to his clients.

The law firms currently seek additional information, documents and other potential evidence regarding these investments, as well as written and/or oral communications which may have occurred with the parties to the lawsuit or arbitration claims. Persons are asked to contact Thomas Ruiz or Kirk Smith at 800-259-9010 or via e-mail to truiz@sselaw.com. All such discussions and contact will be treated confidentially.

Bookmark: Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Google.com Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at del.icio.us Digg Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Digg.com Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Spurl.net Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Simpy.com Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at NewsVine Blink this Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at blinklist.com Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Furl.net Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at reddit.com Fark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Fark.com Bookmark Detroit%20Accounting%20Firm%20Named%20in%20Lawsuit%20Involving%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme%20%20 at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 20, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court Decides That 401(k) Retirement Participants Can Sue for Losses Under ERISA

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that individual participants in 401(k) retirement plans can sue to recover their loses under the federal pension protection law.

Over 50 million workers in the U.S. have a total of $2.7 trillion invested into 401(k) retirement plans which are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Yet, as has recently been the unfortunate fate in court of other investors, judges have ruled against 401(k) participants who seek to recover under the very pension law written to protect them.

James LaRue of Southlake, Texas, filed such a claim stating that the value of his 401(k) plan fell $150,000 when the plan’s administrators failed to follow his instructions to switch to safer investments. Yet, attorneys for the plan administrator claimed the law only allows recovery of losses to the “plan,” not losses of an individual participant in the plan.

Business groups supported LaRue’s employer, arguing that ERISA was written to encourage employers to set up pension plans and only guards against abuses involving the plan as a whole. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, agreed with the plan administrators and the business groups that Mr. LaRue's claim was not covered by ERISA.

Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion for the court which reversed the Court of Appeals’ decision. Justice Steven's opinion held that Mr. LaRue’s claim was allowed under ERISA, stating: “Fiduciary misconduct need not threaten the solvency of the entire plan to reduce benefits below the amount that participants would otherwise receive.”

Unlike those enrolled in traditional pension plans, employees in 401(k) plans choose from a menu of investment options, meaning they make the investment decisions concerning their pension assets. It was thought by many that this would immunize plan administrators from claims of mismanagement. However, today’s Supreme Court decision holds that plan administrators can be held liable, at least for failing to follow instructions of a plan participant.

“Defined contribution plans dominate the retirement plan scene today,” said Justice Stevens, unlike when ERISA was enacted in the mid-1970s. Traditional pension plans, which guarantee a monthly benefit at retirement, have fallen out of favor as most companies - for example the auto manufacturers - seek to eliminate their liability under such plans. 401(k) plans are by far the most popular of the types of defined contribution plans.

The term 401(k) refers to the section in the IRS Code which permits tax-deferred contributions to such plans. Congress enacted ERISA in 1974, after widespread pension fund abuses surfaced. Yet, such abuses continue to surface including, for example, during scandal-ridden collapses of companies such as Enron.

The securities law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards has represented thousands of investors nationwide. Our experienced attorneys and staff have assisted investors with losses in their retirement or other accounts. If you or someone you know may be a victim of mis-conduct, contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards for a free case evaluation by one of our attorneys.

Bookmark: Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Google.com Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at del.icio.us Digg U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Digg.com Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Spurl.net Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Simpy.com Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at NewsVine Blink this U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at blinklist.com Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Furl.net Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at reddit.com Fark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Fark.com Bookmark U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20Decides%20That%20401%28k%29%20Retirement%20Participants%20Can%20Sue%20for%20Losses%20Under%20ERISA at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 19, 2008

Allianz Life Insurance Settles Inappropriate Fixed Annuity Sales Allegations for $10 Million

Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America and California’s insurance department have reached a settlement agreement over allegations that Allianz engaged in inappropriate fixed annuity sales.

Allianz Life will pay $10 million: $3.3 million to the California insurance department, $3 million to investments in the California Organized Investment Network, and $3.75 million, over a five-year period, to California’s Life and Annuity Consumer Protection Fund.

The agreement was reached after the California department of insurance’s market conduct examination results showed that Allianz Life had acted deceptively when it replaced 126 annuities for 84- and 85-year old senior investors.

Over 97% of the annuities sold to these investors from January 2004 through 2005 were considered “financially unsuitable” for their age group. The study also showed that Allianz had used deceptive marketing collaterals that promoted “up-front” and “immediate” bonuses.

In fact, no bonuses were pending unless the annuities were owned for five years. At that time, payments for life or over a 10-year-period would be made.

As part of the agreement, Allianz promised to conduct a suitability review program to improve procedures for dealing with elderly investors.

Allianz is now required to perform an elevated review of applicants older than 64, make a follow-up call to investors older than 75 who live in assisted living facilities, and ensure that all customers have a thorough understanding of any contracts made with Allianz.

By agreeing to settle, Allianz is not admitting that it violated any California laws.

Unfortunately, senior investors are easy targets of broker misconduct and deception. The stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards has helped many elderly investors and their families recover their losses.

Related Web Resources:

Allianz to Pay $10 Mln in Calif. Annuities Case, Reuters, February 14, 2008

Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America


Bookmark: Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Google.com Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at del.icio.us Digg Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Digg.com Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Spurl.net Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Simpy.com Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at NewsVine Blink this Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at blinklist.com Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Furl.net Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at reddit.com Fark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Fark.com Bookmark Allianz%20Life%20Insurance%20Settles%20Inappropriate%20Fixed%20Annuity%20Sales%20Allegations%20for%20%2410%20Million at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 15, 2008

Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, and Other Investment Firms Deal with Frozen Auction-Rate Securities

This week, Goldman Sachs told a number of investors that they could not withdraw money from their auction-rate securities investments. This move by Goldman came as a shock to investors—but the firm was not alone. Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, and other banks have also found themselves notifying their investors that the market for these types of securities are frozen—along with their money. Just this week, there were nearly 1,000 failed auctions. The banks are now refusing to support the auctions and many investors are not sure when they’ll recover their investments.

Usually, auction-rate securities are considered safe alternatives to cash—and banks frequently recommend these bonds, considered long-term securities—to rich individuals and corporations. Banks regularly hold auctions to establish the interest rates and give holders an opportunity to sell their securities.

Auction-Rate Securities
The auction-rate market is valued at $330 billion. Tax-exempt institutions, including municipalities, student loan companies, closed-end mutual funds are among those who participate in the market.

Just because there is a failed auction does not mean the securities have defaulted. Issuers are allowed to pay interest at the “fail rate,” which is the higher rate.

Investors are not happy with the frozen state of the auction-rate securities market. Brokerage firms are not legally bound to make a market in auction securities or provide clients with a price.

One wealthy investors said he bought the securities after Goldman likened them to the equivalent of cash. Another investor, a New Jersey family, is suing Lehman Brothers because the value of its cash in auction-rate securities is decreasing. Drug manufacturer Bristol-Myers Squibb has already had to write-off the $275 million it invested in auction--rate securities because of the failed auctions.

These investments were often compared to money market funds. Many investors were told there was little or no risk in these investments, even after reports surfaced which indicated danger of owning such securities. Some financial firms reportedly encouraged individual investors to purchase these securities as they worked to reduce their own exposure and that of their large institutional clients.

Shepherd, Smith, & Edwards is a stockbroker fraud law firm that represents investors that wish to recover money they have lost because of the misconduct or negligence of an investment adviser, broker, or firm. One of our investment fraud lawyers would be happy to speak with you during a free consultation.

Related Web Resources:

New Trouble in Auction-Rate Securities, New York Times, February 15, 2008

Muni Regulators Seek Disclosure on Auction-Rate Bonds, Bloomberg.com, February 15, 2008

Bookmark: Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Google.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at del.icio.us Digg Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Digg.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Spurl.net Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Simpy.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at NewsVine Blink this Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at blinklist.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Furl.net Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at reddit.com Fark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Fark.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%2C%20Merrill%20Lynch%2C%20Lehman%20Brothers%2C%20and%20Other%20Investment%20Firms%20Deal%20with%20Frozen%20Auction-Rate%20Securities at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 13, 2008

Goldman Sachs Settles Enron Fraud Lawsuit with University of California for $11.5 Million

Goldman Sachs & Co. says it will settle a class action suit filed by the University of California (UC) over the purchase of Enron Corp. securities for $11.5 million. The University of California Board of Regents has approved the terms of the settlement.

Goldman allegedly marketed Enron 7% exchangeable notes via a registration statement that was false and misleading—this is a violation of the 1933 Securities Act.

UC says that it has so far received over $7.4 billion in settlements for Enron investors, including:

JP Morgan Chase: $2.2 billion
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: $2.4 billion
Citigroup: $2 billion
Bank of America: $69 million
Lehman Brothers: $222.5 million
Andersen Worldwide: $33 million
Kirkland & Ellis LLP: $10.2 million
Arthur Anderson LLP: $72.5 million
Enron’s outside directors: $168 million

Barclays Bank, Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse First Boston, Royal Bank of Scotland, Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and several ex-Enron officials have also been named as defendants by UC. The class involves some 1.5 million Enron stock and bond buyers whose losses due to the alleged fraud run over $40 billion.

Last month, U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the decision by an appeals court that blocks securities fraud claims made by Enron shareholders to recover damages from three large investment banks that allegedly helped Enron cover up its losses.

As an investor you have a right to get your money back if you have been the victim of investor fraud. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today and ask for your free consultation with one of our experienced stockbroker fraud lawyers.

Related Web Resources:

Goldman Sachs settles with UC, Daily Bruin, February 9, 2008

Enron Securities Fraud Lawsuit, University of California

Goldman Sachs

The Rise and Fall of Enron, New York Times

Bookmark: Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Google.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at del.icio.us Digg Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Digg.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Spurl.net Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Simpy.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at NewsVine Blink this Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at blinklist.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Furl.net Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at reddit.com Fark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Fark.com Bookmark Goldman%20Sachs%20Settles%20Enron%20Fraud%20Lawsuit%20with%20University%20of%20California%20for%20%2411.5%20Million%20 at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 11, 2008

Pondering the SEC’s Role in the Subprime Mortgage Crisis

What was the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the collapse of the subprime mortgage bubble? Although mortgage brokers, investment banks, and ratings agencies are frequently held responsible for the demise, little is said about the roles of the Financial Industry Regulatory Industry (FINRA) and the SEC—both watchdog agencies that are responsible for monitoring complex credit derivatives and their suitability requirements for investors.

Yet where was the SEC when it was time to oversee investment banks and determine whether they had sufficient capital for their balance sheets, trading positions, and the appropriate risk management systems so that major losses could be avoided?

One notable problem is that there is not enough clear data available about the credit derivatives market. Structured finance products, including collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) are traded over-the-counter in the United States. This means that price information for these products is not easily accessible.

It wasn’t until 2007 that the SEC, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and other members of the President’s Working Group recommended that stricter oversight of the over-the-counter market be implemented.

While regulators are now examining the way banks structured, priced, and sold mortgage-laden securities, some industry insiders feel that these steps were taken too late. Should the SEC have noticed the warning signs?

In 2006, Merrill Lynch senior executive Jeff Kronthal was fired when he responded reluctantly to former Chief Executive Stanley O’Neal’s mandate that firms be more aggressive about taking risks with mortgage securities. Morgan Stanley’s new Chief Executive John Thain rehired Kronthal last December.

In 2005, Bear Stearns reported in its 2005 financial disclosure that it was threatened by a possible civil enforcement action related to pricing, analysis, and valuation of $63 billion in CDOs. Bear Stearns also reported that then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer had contacted the firm about $16 billion in CDOs it had sold to an undisclosed client.

Former SEC attorney Gary Aguirre says that while aggressively pursuing Pequote Capital and its alleged involvement in an insider trading case in 2005, he was fired when he tried to interview Morgan Stanley Chief Executive John Mack. Aguirre claims that the SEC is too closely associated with the industry it regulates.

Earlier this month, securities regulators in Massachusetts filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Merrill Lynch over $14 million in CDOs that the firm sold to the town of Springfield. Regulators say they were unsuitable for and sold without the town’s permission. Merrill has admitted to the town’s lack of consent and paid its investment back in full—although it now has little value.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation says it is conducting criminal investigations into 14 firms regarding their involvement in mortgage securitization activities.

Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, and Goldman Sachs all admit that different regulators have asked them about their handling of subprime mortgage securities.

If you are an investor who has lost money because of the misconduct or negligence of someone in the securities industry, please contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today. Your first consultation with one of our stockbroker fraud lawyers is free.

Related Web Resources:

SEC

Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO), Investopedia

Subprime Mortgage, Investopedia

February 7, 2008

Banc One Securities Will Settle FINRA “Unsuitable" Deferred Variable Annuities Charges for $225,000

Banc One Securities Corp. (BOSC) says it will pay $225,000 to settle Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) charges that it made “unsuitable” sales of deferred variable annuities to 23 clients—21 of them elderly customers over 70 years of age.

FINRA says that BOSC representatives told clients that they should exchange their fixed annuities for variable annuities, which all 23 clients did. The SRO says that the clients then placed 100% of their assets into the variable annuity’s fixed-rate fixture. The payment was 3% maximum.

FINRA says that considering each client’s age, financial situation, investment goals, and income needs, the recommendations were inappropriate. FINRA says that BOSC should have properly supervised these transactions and that oversight procedures and policies failed to require that supervisors look at and assess certain information.

FINRA says that the deferred variable annuities recommendations did not appear to be intended to benefit the customers. Instead, the clients had to pay additional sales charges and their money was locked up.

As part of the settlement agreement, BOSC let all 23 clients sell their deferred variable annuities without incurring any penalties—there is usually a mandatory six-year “surrender” period.

BOSC is not admitting to or denying the charges by agreeing to settle. BOSC, in 2006, merged with JP Morgan Securities Inc.

Financial firms and broker dealers are supposed to always act in their clients’ best interests when making investment recommendations. When failure to act in these best interests results in losses for a client, that person has the right to pursue financial recovery.

Contact the stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards to schedule your free consultation.

Related Web Resources:

Banc One fined for deferred VA sales, Investment News, January 29, 2008

FINRA Fines Banc One for Unsuitable Variable Annuity Sales, Inadequate Supervision of Fixed-to-Variable Annuity Exchanges, FINRA.org, January 29, 2008


Bookmark: Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Google.com Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at del.icio.us Digg Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Digg.com Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Spurl.net Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Simpy.com Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at NewsVine Blink this Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at blinklist.com Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Furl.net Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at reddit.com Fark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Fark.com Bookmark Banc%20One%20Securities%20Will%20Settle%20FINRA%20%E2%80%9CUnsuitable%22%20Deferred%20Variable%20Annuities%20Charges%20for%20%24225%2C000 at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 5, 2008

Heartland Advisors Inc. Settles SEC Charges for $3.9 Million

Heartland Advisors Inc. and several of the investment adviser’s employees have agreed to pay $3.9 Million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission charges that they allegedly violated the Federal Securities Act.

The SEC case stems from incidents that allegedly took place from March through October 2000, when Heartland “negligently mispriced certain bonds owned by two high-yield municipal bond funds." Because the funds were mispriced during that time period, net asset values for the funds were incorrect and so were the prices for funds’ shares.

Redeeming investors therefore benefited at the expense of new and remaining investors when investors bought and redeemed fund shares at these incorrect prices.

Heartland devalued the bonds in October 2000. Shareholders lost some $60 million. The SEC has ordered cease-and-desist proceedings. The order also imposed cease-and-desist actions and remedial sanctions.

Heartland Advisors President William Nasgovitz, Senior VP Kevin Clark, COO Paul Beste, and former employees Greg Winston, Thomas Conlin, Hugh Denison, and Kenneth Della are also named as respondents in the SEC case.

As part of the settlement agreement, all respondents agreed to cease and decease from violating certain federal securities laws. None of them are admitting to or denying the allegations.

Investors who lose money because of the misconduct of broker-dealers or investment advisers are entitled to civil remedies to recover their losses. Please contact the stockbroker fraud law firm of Shepherd Smith and Edwards today to schedule your free consultation. We have helped thousands of investors get their money back.

Related Web Resources:

Heartland to pay $3.9M fine in securities case, Bizjournals.com, January 29, 2008

Read the SEC Order (PDF)

Heartland Advisors

Bookmark: Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Google.com Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at del.icio.us Digg Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Digg.com Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Spurl.net Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Simpy.com Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at NewsVine Blink this Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at blinklist.com Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Furl.net Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at reddit.com Fark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Fark.com Bookmark Heartland%20Advisors%20Inc.%20Settles%20SEC%20Charges%20for%20%243.9%20Million at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 4, 2008

SEC-Commissioned Report Finds that Investors Have A Hard Time Telling the Difference Between the Roles of Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers

Investors have a hard time understanding the differences between investment advisers and broker-dealers, as well as distinguishing between the different services and protections that each group offer. This finding was reported last month in an SEC-commissioned study conducted by Nonprofit policy group Rand Corp.

Rand gathered its findings from data that came from six investor focus groups and a survey it conducted of 654 U.S. households.

Included among the findings:

• Many investors do not know whether they are receiving the standard of care they are owed by their financial service providers.
• Many of these same investors are satisfied with the services provided to them by their financial service providers.
• Accessibility, attentiveness, and trustworthiness in a financial service provider ranked higher than performance or expertise.
• Some investors find it difficult to understand the disclosures provided to them by their investment adviser or broker-dealer.
• Investors don’t always finish reading disclosures.

The SEC ordered the study because it wanted to factually determine the state of the brokerage and investment advisory industries and assess the regulatory and legal environment surrounding investment professionals. It commissioned the study after a federal appeals court struck down an SEC rule that let broker-dealers offer fee-based brokerage accounts and a certain degree of advice without needing to be in compliance with the 1940 Investment Advisers Act. Critics had called the rule controversial, and the SEC wanted to see if this criticism had any merit.

The boundaries between investment advisers and broker dealers are not as delineated as they used to be. Investment Advisers Association Executive Director David Tittswroth says the study's results confirm that many investors are confused.

The growing sophistication of the financial industry makes it harder for regulators to govern the different financial services. Shepherd Smith and Edward is a stockbroker fraud law firm that represents clients who have lost money because their investment accounts were inappropriately handled by a broker-dealer or an investment adviser. Contact Shepherd Smith and Edwards today to schedule a free consultation.


Related Web Resources:

Complexity of Financial Services Industry Makes It Difficult for Individual Investors to Distinguish Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers, Rand.org, January 3, 2008

Read the Full Report, SEC.gov (PDF)

Bookmark: Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Google.com Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at del.icio.us Digg SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Digg.com Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Spurl.net Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Simpy.com Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at NewsVine Blink this SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at blinklist.com Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Furl.net Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at reddit.com Fark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Fark.com Bookmark SEC-Commissioned%20Report%20Finds%20that%20Investors%20Have%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Telling%20the%20Difference%20Between%20the%20Roles%20of%20%20Broker-Dealers%20and%20Investment%20Advisers at Yahoo! MyWeb